College Of Business

College of Business AACSB Self-Evaluation Report ... posted on the University website (www.pvamu.edu ... copied to the faculty files, and sent to ...
pvamu.edu/files/college_of_business/self-evaluation%20report.pdf

 

 DOWNLOAD | Find Similar

 


advertisement

 

 

 

Text Previews (text result may be not accurate)

- i - THE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS List of Tables and Exhibits..................................................................................................i Acknowledgements............................................................................................................vi Preamble....................................................................................................................... .....ix P.1 Eligibility.....................................................................................................1 P.2 Programs within the Scope of Review for AACSB Accreditation..............4 P.3 Readiness for Accreditation Review............................................................6 P.4 Accounting Accreditation............................................................................7 MISSION AND OBJECTIVES M.1 Mission ....................................................................................................10 M.2 Mission Appropriateness..........................................................................12 M.3 Educational Objectives.............................................................................16 M.4 Relative Emphasis on Teaching, Intellectual Contributions, & Service..20 M.5 Consistency of Ac FACULTY COMPOSITIO N AND DEVELOPMENT FD.1. Faculty Planning..................................................................................27 FD.2. Faculty Recruitment, Selection and Orientation..................................30 FD.3. Faculty Development, Pr - ii - C.1 Curriculum Content...................................................................................57 C.2 Curriculum Planning and Evaluation........................................................71 INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN.1 Instructional Resources............................................................................79 IN.2 Collective Faculty Inst ructional Responsibilities....................................86 IN.3 Individual Faculty In structional Responsibilities....................................90 S.1. Students….................................................................................................97 S.2. Career Planning and Placement..............................................................113 IC. 1 Intellect TRANSITION PLAN - iii - Table P.1.c-1 Full-time Faculty Profile by Discipline (Spring 2005)....................................2 Table P.1.c-2 Relative Instructiona - iv - List of Tables and Exhibits (cont’d) Table FD.5-1 Aggregate Faculty Computations, 2002-2005...............................................53 Table C.1.1-1 Coverage of Persp ectives in the BBA Curriculum........................................58 Table C.1.1-2 Coverage of Perspectives in the MBA Curriculum.......................................59 Table C.1.2.a-1 Bachelor of Business Administration Curriculum.........................................60 Table C.1.2.b-1 Coverage of Skills a nd Foundations in the BBA Curriculum........................61 Table C.1.2.c-1 Emphasis on Written and Oral Communication in the BBA Curriculum............................................................................................63 Table C.1.3.a-1 Coverage of Skills and Core Areas in the MBA Curriculum........................66 Table C.1.3.b-1 MBA Curriculum...........................................................................................67 Table C.1.3.c-1 Undergraduate Cour sework Evidence of Basic Skills...................................68 Table C.1.4.b-1 MSA Curriculum...........................................................................................70 Exhibit C.2.1.1 New Course/ Program Approval Process.......................................................73 Table C.2.2-1 EBI Survey Results – Closing the Assessment Loop....................................75 Table C.2.2-2 COB Assessment Efforts – Closing the Loop................................................76 Table IN.1-1 Description of the COB IT Infrastructure......................................................81 Table IN.1-2 Center for Business Communication (2002–2005)........................................85 Table IN.2-1 Innovations in Institutional Practices.............................................................89 Table IN.3-1 Brown-Bag Discu ssions on Teaching (2003–2005)......................................92 Table S.1.a-1 College of Business Scholarship Information................................................98 - v - - vi - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Self-Evaluation Report (SER) is the result of efforts of a large number of dedicated professionals— faculty, staff, and supporters. It took almost a ye ar to complete the project. The first draft dated November 17, 2004, was prepared for the mock accr editation visit in March 2005. While the dean, the department heads, and the chair of the SER Taskfor ce administered the project, active faculty and staff involvement was a constant throughout the life of the project. The College faculty committees were responsible for the initial collection of statistics and other materials that were the building block for each chapter devoted to a specific Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Businesses (AACSB) standard. Help was sought and received promptly fr - vii - SER Taskforce (Summer 2005) Dr. Munir Quddus, Chair Dr. Larry White, Coordinator Dr. Sudhir Tandon Dr. John Dyck Dr. Brian Lee Dr. Rahim Quazi Mission and Strategic Planning Committee Dr. Munir Quddus, Chair Dr. John Dyck, Co-chair Dr. Sudhir Tandon Dr. Sukumar Debnath Dr. Mostafa Soliman Ms. Kimberly Gordon Faculty Composition and Development Committee Dr. Jeanne Hill, Chair Graduate Committee Dr. Omprakash Gupta, Chair Dr. Sudhir Tandon Dr. John Dyck Dr. Emanuel Opara Technology Committee Dr. Emanuel Opara, Chair Mr. Jayaprakash Prathipati Dr. Ahmed Mahfouz President George C. Wright Dr. E. Joahanne Thomas-Smith, Provost and Seni or Vice President for Academic and Student - ix - Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU) is a member of The Texas A&M University System (TAMUS), governed by the TAMUS Board of Regents. Establ ished in 1876, PVAMU is the second oldest public institution of higher learning in Texas. It is one of the two historically black colleges and universities (HBCU) in Houston with a proud legacy of servi - x - Management Processes and Organizational Structure The University and the College of Business have b een under stable leadership that has been firmly committed to Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Businesses (AACSB) accreditation for the past couple of years. President George C. Wrig ht and Provost E. Joahanne Thomas-Smith are knowledgeable regarding the AACSB accreditation pr ocess. The COB enjoys strong support from the University leadership, the Dean ’s Advisory Board, the alumni, and the business community. The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Busi submitted by the PVAMU COB in fall 2002. Over the next three years (2003-2005) in the Candidacy Partnership Program, the Accreditation Plan was su ccessfully implemented. High quality, continuous - xi - were made available for rebuilding the faculty and - xii - College of Business Annual Candidacy Reports, and College of Business Faculty Resumes. Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 1 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 2 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Full-Time Faculty Profile by Discipline (Spring 2005) Number Academically Number Number Other Faculty Resources Accounting 5 2 0 7 Economics 5 0 1 6 Business Communication 1 0 0 1 Finance 4 0 0 4 Law 1 0 0 1 Management 5 3 1 9 Management Information Systems 4 1 1 6 28 6 3 37 University COB Ratios Fiscal Year 2000/2001 $16,259,026 161,807 $1,186,084 15,724 7.29% 9.71% 2001/2002 $16,912,483 167,687 $1,432,334 15,501 8.47% 9.24% 2002/2003 $20,721,071 175,519 $2,034,019 17,586 9.82% 10.01% 2003/2004 $22,195,803 187,110 $2,387,281 18,468 10.76% 9.87% 2004/2005 $28,087,206 201,206 $2,645,815 19,521 9.42% 9.70% Note: SCH = semester credit hour; Source: Prairie View A&M University Factbook 2005; Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 3 of 150 Prairie View A&M University P.1.d: The institution should demonstrate con tinuous efforts to achieve demographic diversity among students, faculty, and staff. Prairie View A&M University is a historically black institution of higher learning. It is one of two historically black colleges and universities in the gr Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 4 of 150 Prairie View A&M University growing the graduate programs (the graduate student body is more diverse than the undergraduate student body and is the fastest growing segment of the student body, up by 82 percent since new study abroad programs and international business programs; new faculty fluent in Spanish interested in ment oring Hispanic students and tutoring faculty and under President Wright’s leadership, a series of st eps to attract more Hispanic and white students to the PVAMU campus (the College expects that th ese efforts to increase di versity will bear fruit P.1.e: The educational environment should be free of external interference or diversion of effort that would prevent achieving the objectives of these standards. The Texas A&M University System is composed of nine different institutions including several doctoral and research universities. PVAMU is one of the cam puses governed by the TAMUS Board of Regents. Each university in TAMUS is subject to the control of the TAMUS chancellor and the Board of Regents. the TAMUS. The provost and senior vice president for academic and student affairs report to the president . Within the University, there are nine Colleges, each headed by a dean who reports to the provost. The dean of the CO B, as the chief academic officer of the unit, is able to make autonomous decisions, subject to the regulations imposed by the University, the TAMUS Board of Regents, and the Texas Higher Edu cation Coordinating Board (THECB). No external interference or diversions exist at this time. The College of Business has enjoyed strong support from the current and past central administrations of the Univer sity. Within the COB, change is effected through Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 5 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table P.2.a-1 rams (Fall Semesters, 2000-2005) Fall 2000 Fall 2001 Fall 2002 Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Accounting 114 125 135 150 149 Finance 44 45 58 51 58 MIS* 234 288 281 217 129 Management 140 232 267 361 386 BBA Total 667 834 891 959 920 MBA Degree 85 86 117 127 144 MSA Degree 2 11 Total 752 920 1008 1088 1075 Note: *This MIS major was previously called Administrative Information Systems (ADSY). Source: University Institutional Research P.2.b: All programs in business adm inistration or management offered by an institution shall be Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 6 of 150 Prairie View A&M University P.3. READINESS FOR ACCREDITATION REVIEW P.3.a: Some programs in business shall have been in operation for a sufficient period of time to make possible an evaluation of their quality. The College of Business at Prairie View A&M Univer sity began with a few narrowly specialized skill courses in the 1930s as part of the College of Arts and Sciences and evolved into a department, a school, and finally a college. In 1973-74, the School of Busi ness (renamed the College of Business in 1976) became a separate academic unit, consisting of two departments. In the same year, a Bachelor of Business Administration degree was offered for the first time for majors in accounting, economics, Accounting 21 19 13 15 23 Finance 11 8 8 10 14 MIS* 41 49 40 56 50 Management 25 25 15 35 44 BBA Total 130 131 104 138 163 MBA 21 15 13 25 30 MSA 8 Total 151 146 117 163 201 Note: *Prior to 2003, this was Administrative Information Systems (ADSY). # These are estimates until confirmed by the THECB. Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 7 of 150 Prairie View A&M University P.3.b: Programs in business shall satisfy the busi ness standards during the year of self-evaluation and the year of visit periods. All undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral degree programs in trate continuing adherence to the standards. The College of Business at Prairie View A&M University is proceeding in earnest to realize its vision of becoming a premier business program. The framework provided by the AACSB International standards has been an integral part of the process we fo llowed for continuous impr ovement and growth. The College stands ready for future challenges while ma intaining its commitment to high-quality education and its mission. This Self-Evaluation Report (SER) dem onstrates that the faculty, staff, and students of Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 8 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Dr. George C. Wright President Dr. E. Joahanne Thomas-Smith Provost and Senior Vice President of Student Affairs Michael McFrazier Associate Provost Linda W. Willis College of Agriculture & Human Services Don Byars Associate Provost for Student Enrollment Services Ikhlas Sabouni Dean School of Architecture Danny Kelle Dean College of Arts & Sciences Munir Quddus College of Business M. Paul Mehta Dean College of Education Milton Bryant Dean College of Engineering William Parker Dean Graduate School Elaine Rodne Dean College of Juvenile Justice & Psychology Rosie Albritton Library Services Don Collins Program Assessment Lettie Raab University College John Williams Distance Learning Center for Teaching Excellence Exhibit P.1c-1 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 9 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Exhibit P.1c-2 Organizational Chart Dean’s Advisory Board COB Student Advisory Council K. Gordon Assistant to the Dean Development & Placement C. Allen Assistant to the Dean Small Business Development Center A. Irvin J. Prathipati Computer Service Specialist Accounting MISY Faculty S. Tandon Dept. of Marketing Management Head Dept. of Accounting, Finance & Management J. Dyck Graduate Programs in M. Herrington Management & Marketing Faculty Administrative Assistant Self-Evaluation Report Precond itions College of Business Page 10 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 10 of 150 Prairie View A&M University M1. MISSION M.1. The school must have a clear and published mi ssion statement that is subjected to periodic review and revised as needed. The Prairie View A&M University COB has developed clear vision and mission statements to guide its operations. These statements were first develope d in 2001-2002 after extensive dialogue with and participation of important constituents of the COB. The mission statement is in line with the AACSB accreditation standards and aligned with the Prairi e View A&M University mission statement. The Mission and Strategic Planning Committee is responsible for revisiting the mission statement at least once every two years. The most recent revision took place in spring 2005. Developing and revising the statement and publicizing the mission through various medi a ensure its relevancy to the day-to-day life of The vision of the College of Business is to be a premier business institution that empowers students to realize their dreams through an excellent education. The mission of the COB is to provide a diverse st udent body with a business education that produces Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 11 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Intellectual Contributions: Engaging in intellectual contributions is our second priority with an assigned weight of 30 percent in the evaluation process. We encourag e research that provides insights into business education, practical aspects of industry, and the theory of business. We actively support interdisciplinary and collabo rative efforts in intellectual contributions because complex issues in business are best understood by drawing from many basic disciplines throughout academe. We support a wide spectrum of intellectual contri butions that are of relevance and add value to the body of knowledge in management prac tice and education. The College encourages faculty to pursue a mix of scholarship in management practices and pedagogical topics. Service is our third priority with an assigned we ight of 20 percent in the evaluation process. All members of the COB community are encouraged to use their expertise to benefit external stakeholders and to create opportunities for stude nts and faculty to apply their knowledge and We seek alliances and partnerships with business and industry leaders to add relevance to our curriculum and educational mission. We encourage community outreach activities to assist the local communities in business and economic development. Development of the Mission Statement The College began developing a mi ssion statement in fall 2001. Faculty members were assigned to committees each aligned to one of the six standard s emphasized in the AACSB International accreditation process. The Mission and Strategic Planning Committ ee (MSPC) led the efforts in developing a new mission statement that would guide the institution in its quest for AACSB International accreditation. The chair of this committee served as a coordinator fo r the accreditation and assessment efforts. Starting Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 12 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Exhibit M.1-1 Mission Statement Review Process Periodic reviews are scheduled every two years Change in COB Dean Change in PVAMU President Change in PVAMU or TAMU mission Dean’s Advisory Board Mission and Strategic Planning Committee and Dean Mission guides strategic planning a The mission is published in the Undergraduate and Graduate Catalogs, in every issue of COB Faculty Handbook M.2 MISSION APPROPRIATENESS M.2: The school’s mission must be appropriate to higher education for business and management and consonant with the mission of the institution of which it is a part. The mission of the College of Business is consonant with that of Prairie View A&M University. Both have a commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and service and to a continuation of the land-grant tradition of the Morrill Act of 1890, while keeping its doors open to all students regardless of race, creed, color, gender, or national origin. Prairie View A&M University is a member of Th e Texas A&M University System (TAMUS) and is accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the S outhern Association of Colleges and Schools for awarding bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees. The mission statements of the University as well as TAMUS accurately reflect their commitments as institu tions of higher education to offering programs of study in various disciplines, in cluding business management. Table M.2-1 presents a crosswalk to demonstrate that the College’s miss ion is consonant with the Univers ity’s mission. Further, the COB expends resources and engages in activities appropriate for an institution of higher learning in business Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 13 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table M.2-1 COB and University Missions and Suppo rtive College Activities (2002-2005) COB University COB Activities in Support of the Mission Recurring Excellence in Excellence in Investment in multimedia technology Recruited qualified faculty members (2002- 2005) Dean’s Excellence in Teaching Award Faculty brown bag seminars Student evaluations Assessment of learning (Educational Benchmarking, Inc., [EBI] survey and Excellence in Excellence in Dean’s Excellence in Research Award Reduced teaching load Summer research grants Research training Software Travel support $1,000 $350,000 $25,000 $5,000 $20,000 $30,000 $110,000/2006 Excellence in Excellence in Dean’s Excellence in Service Award Evaluation and merit raise New centers— Small Business Development Center (SBDC) and Center for International Business Education (CIBE) Membership with local chambers of commerce $1,000 $40,000/2005 $40,000 $1,000 High-Quality, Premier Business Institution Institution of the AACSB accreditation candidacy, mock visit, Diverse Student Body Skills— Employable Professionals Preparing Undergraduates for a Range of Established the Center for Business Communications with professional staff Increased emphasis on internships and co-ops Special events (Black Executive Exchange Program [BEEP]) for students to develop Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 14 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table M.2-1 (cont’d) Empower Students to Achieve Their Dreams Respond to the Needs and Aspirations of Individuals, Black Executive Exchange Program Curricular changes—personal finance and IB minors Building relations with corporations $2,000 $1,000 $1,000 Aspiring to Graduate Programs Committed to Advance Education. New MSA program Recruited full-time director of graduate programs and staff New fee for MBA placement office Increased recruitment efforts (membership with the National Black and Hispanic MBA Associations) $300,000 $95,000 $500 High-Quality Conducting national searches for qualified Recruited 15 new faculty over the last three Source: College of Business documents; the financial figures are approximate. The College has worked hard to bu ild partnerships with a broad range of external constituents including business and industry. These relationships are cultivat ed for resources, ideas, and input for continuous improvement: Dean’s Advisory Board —For the past three years, the COB has received strong support from an active Board. Consistent with the College’s mi ssion, the dean has cultivated relationships with senior managers in business and industry inter ested in supporting the College to develop Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 15 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table M.2-2 Dean’s Advisory Board (Spring 2005) Name Position/Organization Address Phone/E-mail Robert Bernal Houston, TX 77040 robert.a.bernal@jci.com Assistant Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of 1801 Allen Parkway Houston, TX 77019 Donald.Bowers@dal.frb.org Felix Braggs ConocoPhillips Company 600 North Dairy Ashford Houston, TX 77079-1175 felix.e.braggs@conocophillips.com Rodney Brisco President and CEO Elegant Epicurean Catering, Houston, TX 77094 info@elegantepicur eancatering.com Glen Hegar Texas, District 28 P.O. Box 1008 Katy, TX 77492 Jamie G. House Executive VP & CFO Smith Graham & Comp. 6900 Chase Tower Managing Director P.O. Box 760218 Lathrup Village, MI City of Waller Economic Dev. Corporation Mayor Prairie View, Texas P.O. Box 188 Vernell Jackson Vice President & General Manager Boeing P.O. Box 7730 MC K79-60 Wichita, KS 67277-7730 Vernell.jackson@boeing.com Solomon Musyimi Attorney-at-Law The Law Firm of Solomon Musyimi Ray Nelson Contracting Tech. Leader 12031 Strang Road La Porte, TX 77572 Ray.C.Nelson-1@usa.dupont.com Waller County, Texas Bobby E. Scott Internal Revenue Service 1919 Smith St. M/S Houston, TX 77002 bobby.e.scott@irs.gov President Magnolia Chamber of Commerce Magnolia, TX 77353 Georgia A. Thomas Internal Revenue Service Houston, TX 77074-9919 Georgia.A.Thomas@irs.gov Fred Washington Associate Vice President, Finance and Administration Prairie View A&M University 936-857-2952, 2953 President Waller Area Chamber of Commerce Waller, TX 77484 vince@wallerchamber.com Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 16 of 150 Prairie View A&M University M.3 EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES M.3. The school must specify th e educational objectives of each degree program offered and identify the characteristics of students and oth er constituents served by each of those degree In pursuit of its efforts to offer high-quality educa tional programs consistent with accreditation standards, the COB offers a 123-semester-credit-hour Bachelor of Business Administration degree, a 36-semester- credit-hour Master of Business Administration degree, and a 30-semester-credit-hour Master of Science in Accounting degree. The BBA program allows st udents to pick one of five majors—accounting, Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 17 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Learning Objectives for the BBA knowledge from various disciplines (including Each undergraduate major in business builds on the ge neral education and the COB core to achieve additional goals and objectives: major seeks to offer a quality, comprehe nsive accounting education that prepares students for immediate employment in the privat e and public sectors, as well as for graduate or professional education. Students, the program’s mo st valued stakeholders, are provided with a curriculum that offers a quality business educat ion with a solid liberal arts foundation to encourage logical, analytical, and creative thinki ng. Accounting majors attend lectures and have opportunities to participate in activities designed to develop them into c onfident, global-minded Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 18 of 150 Prairie View A&M University management major is based on the belief that the development of competent managers for based on a liberal arts foundation that emphasizes the understanding of the economic, soci al, and political forces in a multicultural global environment. The major emphasis of the management curriculum is on problem The Master of Business Administration progr am is designed for graduate students who demonstrate potential for acquiring advanced knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in a Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 19 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Program Learning Objectives for the MBA The Master of Science in Accounting curriculu m is designed to provide advanced accounting preparation for careers in public, private, and governmental accounting. The aim of the program is to produce graduates who are capable of solv ing problems relating to the accounting field in a Characteristics of students and other constituents served The COB considers students for admission in the u ndergraduate and graduate programs once they have Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 20 of 150 Prairie View A&M University In fall 2004, for the undergraduate students enrolled in the COB, the average SAT scores were 944 (470 in Verbal and 474 in Math), and the combined average ACT score was 19. The College’s SAT scores were somewhat be tter than the University average (404 and 402 on Verbal and Math, respectively). Recent statistics show an upward trend in these scores as the University and the College strive to reduce the number of provi sional admits and increase admission standards to Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 21 of 150 Prairie View A&M University the College’s activities are consistent with its mission Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 22 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Faculty Composition and Development Committee This group is responsible for maintaining AACSB sta ndards with respect to faculty sufficiency. The Committee also acts as the peer-review committee for pr omotion and tenure decisions and is composed of tenured faculty members. Student Committee This group is responsible for maintaining AACSB st andards with respect to students. The Committee assists with review of assessment (EBI Survey of St udent Satisfaction) and acts as the scholarship and Curriculum Content and Evaluation Committee This committee is responsible for ensuring that a ll curriculum issues are ha ndled in accordance with AACSB standards. The group reviews all change ng to existing and new courses and programs in the COB. It has faculty re presentation from most functional areas in business. It is also involved in assessment activities, monitoring the results of course-embedded assessment, and the Faculty Composition and Development Jeanne Hill—Chair S. Debnath P. Sutanto Evaluate all tenure-track faculty on schedule Review promotion application Review tenure and post-tenure applications Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 23 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Student Development Alfreda Dobiyanski—Chair Sonja Langley—Co-chair G. Nelson R. Reed J. Jasper Review scholarship applications Review student grade appeals and disciplinary appeals Advise on internship and related policies Deal with relevant policy issues that may arise during the course of the semester Curriculum Content and Evaluation Larry White—Chair M. Soliman F. Handforth Mahfouz Instructional Resources and Responsibilities Reginald Bell—Chair Intellectual Contributions Rahim Quazi—Chair J. Yang N. Geismar Organize the research seminar series Consider new policies or revisions of existing policies pertaining to improving the research environment to reach AACSB International goals Periodically collect and analyze the data of faculty intellectual contributions, Mission and Strategic Planning Munir Quddus—Chair J. Dyck—Co-chair M. Khan S. Debnath M. Soliman S. Tandon K. Gordon Review the mission (as committed in the Accreditation Plan) and make sure it is widely disseminated and is used in policy making Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 24 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Additional committees and taskforces are used to perform other tasks with in the COB. The role of each of these groups is described in the COB Faculty Handbook or their charge and is briefly given below. This group consists of graduate faculty and recommends policies and procedures to the dean and graduate faculty for improvement of the MBA and MSA progra ms. The Committee assists the director of graduate programs with admission and curriculum issues in th e graduate business programs. The director also The Committee monitors the COB technology infrastructur e and ensures that it is at par with accreditation standards. Composed mostly of MIS faculty, this group is responsible for the technology plan in the College and for recommending policies to the dean. The group works closely with the computer service specialist in the COB to ensure that the technology hardware, software, and serv ices available to business students and faculty are superior. Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 25 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Voluntary Income Tax Assistance (VITA) VITA is the College’s service learning program. Under faculty supervision and with active support of the Internal Revenue Service, accounting students offer w eekly assistance at various sites to individuals and businesses interested in filing their income tax electronica lly. This is the third year of our program, which has been greatly expanded, with special outreach to the Houston Korean community. Prior to being accepted in Candidacy, the College of Business prepared the Accreditation Plan based on a strength and weakness analysis. The text below pr esents information on how the College has addressed the weaknesses in the area of mission development since that time. Weaknesses Identified in the Accreditation Plan (Summer 2002) Current Status (Summer 2005) The mission was not adequately employed in guiding policies in the areas of faculty development, curriculum, instructional resources and responsibilities, and intellectual contributions. ll 2002 and first major revision in spring 2005, the College administration and faculty are acutely aware of the mission; this has resulted in the mission being used as a guiding document in the life of the College in the decision-making process. The mission was not adequately displayed to raise awareness. The mission is displayed in the building display Evidence of Continuous Improvement The vision and mission statements, after their initia l formulation in fall 2002, were revised. The process of revision was refreshing as a large nu mber of faculty and other constituents were voluntary participants and genuinely contributed to the dialogue. The mission statement formed th e basis for the strategic plan (2005-2009) approved by the faculty in May 2005. Many of the mission elem ents are reflected in the goals, objectives, and strategies of the College. The mission forms the basis of the core values and relative emphasis on teaching, intellectual contributions, and service. These weights are used to evaluate faculty performance and allocate The Center for International Business Educati on, the Small Business Development Center, and initiatives in personal finance and entrepreneurship are all dictated by the mission that guides the College to be relevant to the local communities Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 26 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Future Plans Reorganizing the College administrative structure to include an associate or assistant dean to take care of assessment, grants, recruitment, re tention and placement will increase efficiency. Faculty Handbook and standards for promotion and te nure will be revised to reflect the increased emphasis on the quality of intellectual contributions. The graduate programs will be e xpanded to explore the possibility of an executive MBA or an overseas program to broaden the revenue base. Admission standards to the College will be furt her strengthened to ensu Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 27 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 28 of 150 Prairie View A&M University COB Full-Time Faculty Members (Spring 2005) Degree/Field Degree Bailey, H. Associate TT M Management PhD/Management Saint Louis University Bell, R. Assistant TT M Business Comm. PhD/Education University of Chen, W. Assistant TT M MIS EdD University of Chong, H. Associate NTT M Accounting PhD/Accounting University of Debnath, S. Associate T M Management DBA/Management Mississippi State University Desselle, B. Assistant NTT F Accounting MBA/Doctoral University of Dobiyanski, Instructor NTT F Accounting MS/Accounting Sam Houston State University Dyck, J. Assistant NTT M Management PhD/Indus. Psych. University of Feucht, F. Assistant TT M Accounting PhD/Accounting Texas A&M University Geismar, H. Assistant TT M Management PhD/Management University of Texas at Dallas Gupta, O. Professor T M Management PhD/Operations Purdue University Handforth, F. Assistant TT M Finance PhD/Finance University of Hinson, S. Instructor NTT F MIS MS/Occupational Univ. of Houston Holloway, R. Instructor NTT M MIS MS/Comp. Info. Sys. Univ. of S. Jasper, J. Assistant TT M Finance PhD/Dev. University Joonas, K. Assistant Khan, M. Associate T M Finance PhD/Economics Simon Fraser University Langley, S. Assistant TT F Economics PhD/Economics Auburn University Lee, B. Associate T M Accounting PhD/Accounting Temple University Liang, L. Instructor NTT F Management MS/Human Res. Purdue University Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 29 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Mahfouz, A. Assistant TT M MIS PhD/MIS Texas A&M University Nelson, G. Associate T M Management PhD/Management North Texas State University Opara, E. Assistant TT M MIS DBA/Management Golden State University Pence, K. Assistant TT F Accounting PhD/Accounting University of Quazi, R. Assistant TT M Economics PhD/Economics University of Quddus, M. Professor T M Economics PhD/Economics Vanderbilt University Reed, R. Assistant TT M Accounting DBA/Accounting Louisiana Tech University Sharma, S. Instructor NTT M Economics PhD/Applied University of Soliman, M. Associate T M Economics PhD/Economics Iowa State University Sutanto, P. Associate T M Management PhD/Production University of Tandon, S. Associate Tomiuk, D. Assistant TT M MIS ABD/MIS Concordia University Wallace, F. Associate TT M Economics PhD/Economics Rice University White, L. Assistant TT M Management PhD/Operations University of Yang, J. Assistant TT M Finance PhD/Ag. Economics Texas A&M University Note: T = tenured, TT = tenure track, NTT = non-tenure track The dean, department heads, discipline coordinators , various committees, and faculty in each department are fully engaged in decisions regarding faculty needs, recruitment, deployment, evaluation, and development. This comprehensive faculty pla nning process is being revisited for continuous improvement. The COB Faculty Handbook includes most of the policies pertaining to faculty planning and development. Advance planning is important give Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 30 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Policies and Processes on Faculty Development Policies and Processes Date Action Taken Higher Written Minimal Promotion The Faculty Composition and Development Committee worked on a set of written minimal standards that were presented to the COB faculty and approved after a long discussion. A large majority of the faculty voted in favor of the new higher standards. Research Incentive Plan Spring 2002 The Intellectual Contributions Committee deliberated on how to increase faculty research and presented several summer research grants, faculty recognition, development funds, and policies to connect merit raises to success in publishing journal articles. Graduate Faculty with the criteria (later revised in response to the AACSB Candidacy Committee comments). The policy was adopted by the faculty and implemented, creating the graduate faculty body. Merit Raise Guidelines Spring 2005 in the Business Council. These were then shared with the Faculty Composition and Development Committee and with the rest of the faculty. Suggestions from the FCDC were incorporated into the final guidelines. Excellence Awards Spring 2005 In the fall and again in the sp ring, the dean sends a memo inviting faculty members to nominate colleagues for these awards. The nominated faculty members are invited to submit a portfolio. The appropriate committee (which includes last year’s winner) is asked to recommend his or her selections for the awards. FD.2 FACULTY RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, AND ORIENTATION FD.2.a: Recruitment and selection practices should be consistent with the school’s mission and degree programs. Please refer to Exhibit FD.2.a-1 that describes faculty recruitment and selection policies and practices in the College. The TAMUS, PVAMU Office of Huma n Resources, and EOAA office require the College to follow well-defined non-discriminatory policies a nd procedures for faculty search and appointment. In fall 2003, the Faculty Composition and Development Committee presented to the faculty for approval a Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 31 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Hiring Procedures for Tenure-Track Faculty Dean seeks authorization for hiring from university administration Dean forms Faculty Search Committee (FSC) and designates chair The Faculty Composition and Development Committee is responsible for developing, modifying, and overseeing plans for conference interviews, phone interviews, campus visits, evaluation of candidates, and offer recommendations. Department Head requests the Dean to hire a new faculty member approves request for hiring? authorized? FSC ranks candidates for purpose of campus visit FSC conducts preliminary interviews FSC reviews applications and identifies top candidates for further consideration Human Resources publicizes position in national publication and other media FSC gathers input from faculty and students and makes recommendations regarding candidates to Department Head and Dean Candidates are interviewed on campus, which includes in-class teaching, research presentation, meeting with faculty and University administrators Department Head, in consultation with the Dean, contacts candidates for campus visit. Dean calls references and supervisors, consults with Provost’s office, and makes decision favorable? Check next candidate Dean negotiates offer and terms of employment negotiations successful? Check next candidate Dean seeks Provost’s approval to make a formal offer accepted? Candidate Contact next candidate Renegotiate or contact Yes Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 32 of 150 Prairie View A&M University These policies aim to maximize the probability of recruiting the best candidates for faculty positions and are in alignment with the equal opportunity and affi rmative action hiring guidelines. Since the College started the AACSB Candidacy Partnership process, all f aculty recruitments have been guided by a desire to hire faculty who are academically or professi onally qualified to teach at the undergraduate and graduate level. The process is faculty driven and transparent. At the conclusion of the search, the documentation related to the search is submitted to the human resources (HR) office as well as to the EOAA office. In recent years, the College has substantially bu Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 33 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The documents provided in the orientation folder include: Undergraduate and Graduate Catalogs, Conduct of Federal Employees, COB Faculty Handbook, Student Handbook, schedule of classes, QUESTIONS As a result of my recent orientation and receipt of orientation materials, I understand: 1 The expectations for my participation in the advisement/registration process. 2 The Universit ’s ex conduct as a classroom teacher. 3 The Colle e of Business’s ex erformance. of the Colle 5 The ex research activit 6 The ex ectations of service contributions I am ex ected to make. rocess and methods tha 8 The sco services contributions I am ex rocedure for re 10 The covera lies when I am absent from classes. The support services offered by the Univ ersity and College (i.e., voicemail, me for my teaching, research, and service responsibilities Overall Average 4.32 Notes: * Sample size = 11; scale: 5 = completely agr Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 34 of 150 Prairie View A&M University FD.2.c: The school should demonstrate continuous efforts to achieve demographic diversity in its The demographic composition of the faculty body in the College of Business and the University are illustrated in Tables FD.2.c-1.and FD.2.c-2, respectiv ely. Prairie View A&M University is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. The faculty search and recruitment process is designed to ensure non-discrimination. The College administ ration and the search committees are committed to the TOTAL White 11 38 5 63 Black 5 17 1 13 Hispanic Asian 8 28 2 25 American Indian 1 3 International 4 14 Total 29 100 8 101 Notes: *Percent columns show rounded figures and may not add to 100; Source: Institutional Research University Full-Time Faculty Demographics (Spring 2005) TOTAL White 64 25 27 21 Black 128 50 90 69 Hispanic 5 2 2 2 Asian 49 19 9 7 American Indian 1 0 International 8 3 3 2 Total 255 99 131 101 Notes: *Percent columns show rounded figures and may not add to 100; Source: Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 35 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 36 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 37 of 150 Prairie View A&M University In addition to this annual evaluation, the COB has Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 38 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Full-Time Faculty by Rank (Spring 2005) Instructor Total Accounting 2 3 2 7 Finance 1 3 4 MIS 3 2 5 Management 1 4 2 2 9 Economics 1 2 2 2 7 Business Law 1 1 Communications 1 1 Total for Each Rank 3 10 16 8 37 Full-Time Faculty by Tenure Status (Spring 2005) Tenured Tenure Track Non-tenure Track Total Accounting 1 3 3 7 Finance 1 3 4 MIS 3 2 5 Management 4 4 2 10 Economics 2 3 1 6 Business Law/ Communications 2 2 Category 10 19 8 37 Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 39 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Tenure and Promotion Evaluation Procedures Minimum standards for tenure and promotion The University and the COB Handbook explain that while excellence in teaching is desirable, a faculty member is expected to provide evidence of good and effective instruction during the period of evaluation under consideration. The evaluation of instruction will be based on multiple measurements including an assessment of Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 40 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Intellectual Contribution While excellence in terms of intellectual contributi on is desirable, an academically qualified faculty member is expected to provide ev idence of a satisfactory level of productivity (intellectual contribution) during the period of evaluation under consideration. Th e minimal expectation of intellectual contributions is higher for graduate faculty. Professionally qualified (PQ) faculty may have a higher teaching load and, consequently, a lower requirement for intellectual contribution. As outlined by AACSB International, a broad spectrum of activities is included in the area of intellectual contribution. While a faculty member’s contri bution in any of these areas will be taken into consideration, the minimum requirements for satisf actory performance in this area shall include the Tenure and/or Promotion to Associate Professor Three refereed journal publications Promotion to Full Professor Four publications in well-recognized refereed journals While excellence in service is desirable, a faculty memb er is expected to provide evidence of satisfactory contributions in the areas of service—to the University (to include the department, college, and university levels), profession, and the community—during th A faculty member being evaluated should demonstrat e and document his or her individual contributions to the continued development of the College and/or University, the service to the students, the profession, or the community. FD.3.c: The school should support continuing faculty intellectual development and renewal. upport faculty intellectual development and renewal: encouraging and supporting faculty, financially an d otherwise, to attend and present papers at organizing a faculty research seminar series with guest speakers from research universities; encouraging faculty members to share their resear ch work with colleagues and receive feedback in the research seminar series; paying for journal submission fees; upgrading computer hardware and software upon request; Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 41 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Tabled FD.3.c-1 and FD.3.c-2 present information on so Faculty Leave Track (onlin e) Training Fall 2004 Mandatory training for TAMUS new online leave system Diversity Workshop Fall 2004 Workshop to increase sensitivity of faculty members regarding gender and race issues Dean’s Excellence in Teac hing Award Spring 2003 Given each spring during the award ceremony to recognize outstanding teaching Dean’s Excellence in Res earch Award Spring 2003 Given each spring during the award ceremony to recognize outstanding research Dean’s Excellence in Serv ice Award Spring 2003 Given each spring during the award ceremony to recognize outstanding service SPSS Training in Washington, D.C. Summer 2005 Dr. K. Joonas receive d travel support to upgrade her skills in statistical analysis Certified Financial Planning Training Summer 2003 Dr. J. Jasper received support to upgrade his skills by taking preparatory courses on personal finance (Certified Financial Planner [CFP]) at Rice University Teaching Workshop Fall 2003 Expert from the Center of Teaching Excellence; Texas A&M presented a half-day workshop in COB Teaching Brown Bag Seminars Fall 2002; ongoing An ongoing effort to improve the dialogue among faculty on teaching and gain skills Research Seminars Fall 2002; ongoing An ongoing effort to support faculty in building their research skills and creating opportunities for mentoring and collaboration International Education (BIE) Seminars and Workshop Spring 2004; ongoing Ten faculty members have received training offered by various Centers for International Business and Education Research (CIBERs) on IB teaching and research and grant-writing opportunities Faculty Overseas Travels Summer 2005 Supported by the BIE grant, Dr. Wallace traveled to Mexico; he to South Africa and Botswana SBDC Workshops Fall 2004; ongoing These surveys on Quicken, how to start your business, and other topics are available to COB faculty and staff at no cost AACSB Conferences Fall 2002- Spring 2005 Several faculty members—Drs. Dyck, Hill, Khan, Tandon, Opara, Gupta, and Sutanto— AACSB Assessment Workshop Fall 2005 Scheduled in the COB with guest presenter from Illinois State University SEDONA Training Summer 2005 The COB has subscribed to the SEDONA software to improve faculty activities data Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 42 of 150 Prairie View A&M University COB Intellectual Contributions Seminars (2004-2005) FD.3.d: The school should support faculty partici pation in academic and professional organizations. The COB strongly supports, financially and otherw ise, participation in professional and academic organizations as a means to fulfill its mission of exce 1. Drs. R. Bell and R. Quazi 09/23 Effectiv e Visual Aid Usage across Business Disciplines 2. Dr. R. Reed 09/30 The Internal Controls of the Hudson Bay Company 3. Dr. J. Hill 10/11 The Impact of Living Abroad and Purchasing Experience on Country-of-Origin Preferences 4. Dr. J. Yang 10/22 5. Dr. K. Joonas 10/27 An Empirical Investigation of a Model of Environmentally Concerned Consumer Behavior 6. Dr. G. Chong Southampton Business School 11/03 Materiality Thresholds in the United Kingdom Current Research Interests, Plans, and Strategies 7. Dr. E. Opara 11/05 An Examination of Web Services Using SOAP: An Integrated Business Solution 8. Mr. S. Chatterjee 11/30 Establishing Compliance for the Financial Planning Program 9. Dr. A. Mahfouz 02/11 10. Dr. N. Geismar 02/23 Throughput Maximization in Robotic Cells 12. Dr. B. Lee 03/17 Why Is the Value Relevance of Earnings Lower for High-Tech Firms? 13. Dr. F. Wallace 03/23 An Alternative Test of Purchasi ng Power Parity 14. Dr. R. Quazi 03/31 Economic Freedom and FDI in Developing Countries 15. Dr. G. Chong 04/13 Performance Measurement of the U.K. Biotechnology Industry 16. Distinguished Speaker Dr. S. Bhuian Louisiana Tech University 04/15 How to Publish? Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 43 of 150 Prairie View A&M University FD.3e:The school should have clear policies co ncerning outside faculty activities, both paid and ion and with other institutional policies. COB policies relating to outside employment are govern ed by the Prairie View A&M University and The Texas A&M University System policies (TAMUS Polic ies 31.05, 31.05.02, and 07.01). The University HR office requires faculty and staff working outside th e campus to fill an outside employment declaration form annually. These are kept in the human reso urces office. The COB administration believes that outside voluntary activity and c onsulting with businesses should be encouraged. Consulting with business and industry adds to faculty professional expertise and enriches classroom instruction. Faculty members are encouraged to seek in ternship and consulting in summer months. For administrators on 12- month appointments, University policies restrict outside paid activities during normal working hours. These policies are consistent with the COB mission of excellence in teaching, research, and service. FD.4. FACULTY SIZE, COMPOSITION, AND DEPLOYMENT FD.4.a: The school should maintain a full-time faculty sufficient to provide stability and ongoing The COB at Prairie View A&M University has worked hard to maintain a core full-time qualified faculty Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 44 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table FD. 4. a-1 COB Faculty Qualifications and Full-Ti me/Part-Time Status (Spring 2005) Name of Faculty Degree Degree Certification AQ/PQ ACCOUNTING Chong, H. Gin Associate PhD (1999) Accounting ACCA FT AQ Lee, Brian Associate PhD (1994) Accounting CPA,CMA FT AQ Feucht, Frederick Assistant PhD (2004) Accounting CPA FT AQ Pence, D. Kay Assistant PhD (1996) Accounting FT AQ Reed, Randy Assistant DBA (1998) Accounting FT AQ Dobiyanski, A. Instructor MS (1984) Accounting CPA,CMA FT PQ Pitts, Tony Adjunct MBA (1973) (Mgmt./Acct.) PT Other ECONOMICS Quddus, Munir Prof. PhD (1985) Economics FT AQ Soliman, Mostafa Associate PhD (1967) Economics FT AQ Wallace, Fred Associate PhD (1987) Economics FT AQ Langley, Sonja Assistant PhD (2003) Economics FT AQ Quazi, Rahim Assistant Ph D (1999) Economics FT AQ Sharma, Satish Adjunct PhD (1970) Econ/Fin. FT Other Thiagarajan, K.R. Adjunct MA (1955) Economics PT Other FINANCE (Dept. Head) Associate PhD (1986) Econ/Fin. FT AQ Handforth, Frank Assistant PhD (2003) Finance CFA FT AQ Jasper, Jan Assistant PhD 1999) Dev. Planning CFP FT AQ Yang, Jian Assistant PhD (1999) Econ/Finance CFA FT AQ Blyden, Lois Adjunct JD (1987) Law PT PQ Haq, Sanzid Adjunct MBA (1998) Finance CPA, CMA PT PQ MANAGEMENT Omprakash Professor PhD (1980) Industrial Eng. FT AQ Bailey, Henri L. Associate PhD (1982) Business FT PQ Sukumar Associate DBA (1988) Management FT AQ Nelson, George Associate PhD ( 1988) Management FT Other Bell, Reginald Assistant PhD (1997) Bus. Ed. FT AQ Dyck, John Assistant PhD (1974) Psychology FT PQ Geismar, H. Neil Assistant PhD (2003) Management FT AQ White, Larry Assistant PhD (2002) Management FT AQ Liang, Lei Instructor M.S (2002) Management FT PQ Note: FT = full-time faculty, PT = part-time faculty Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 45 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Bell, Reginald Assistant PhD (1997) Bus. Ed. FT AQ Chen, Wenshin Assistant EdD (2005) Inst. Tech FT AQ Mahfouz, Ahmed Assistant PhD (2004) MIS FT AQ Opara, Emmanuel Assistant DBA (1995) Mgmt. FT AQ Tomiuk, Daniel Assistant MS (1997) IS FT AQ Hinson, Shelly Instructor MS (1999) Occ. Tech FT Other Holloway, Reginald Instructor MS (1990) Comp. Sc. FT PQ Ballentine, Wayne Adjunct MS (1997) Occ. Tech. PT PQ Note: AQ = academically qualified faculty, PQ = professionally qualified faculty, FT = full-time Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 46 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Academically Qualified (AQ) Faculty : The faculty member must have a terminal degree in the area of teaching assignment, or in a related area, as ou Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 47 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Accounting Faculty Qualifications Teaching Status, and MFTE Name Rank Degree Qua. Status FTE SCH Teaching Other Total Lee, Brian Associate Ph.D./CPA AQ FT 1 1 144 Chong, Gin Associate Ph.D./ACCA AQ FT 1 1 183 Feucht, F Assistant Ph.D./CPA AQ FT 1 1 267 Reed, R Assistant DBA AQ FT 1 1 162 Pence, K Assistant Ph.D. AQ FT .75 .25 1 270 Dobiyanski, A Instructor MS/CPA/CMA PQ FT 1 1 222 Desselle, B Instructor MBA/CPA PQ FT .75 .25 1 285 Pitts, Tony Adjunct MBA PT .25 .25 81 Total FTE Credit Hours 7.08 .50 7.58 1665 Percentage of Total SCH Genera ted by Full-Time Faculty = 95% Notes: For graduate faculty, the full-time load is defined as 9 SCH per semester as per graduate committee’s recommendation effective spring 200 5; see MFTE calculations in Table FD.5-1. Teaching Other Total Khan, M. Associate PhD AQ FT 0.67 0.33 1 144 Handforth, F. Assistant PhD/CFA AQ FT 1 1 273 Jasper, J. Assistant PhD/CFP AQ FT 0.75 0.25 1 288 Yang, J. Assistant PhD/CFA AQ FT 0.67 0.33 1 153 Blyden, L. Adjunct JD PQ PT 0.25 0.25 183 Haq, S. Adjunct MBA/CPA/CMA PQ PT 0.25 0.25 39 Total FTE Credit Hours 4.26 0.91 5.17 1299 Total MFTE = 3.41, Actual FT Faculty = 5 Percentage of Total SCH Generated by Full-Time Faculty = 83% For graduate faculty, the full-time load is defi ned as 9 SCH per semester effective spring 2005 Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 48 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table FD.4.b-3 shows the full-time or part-time, AQ or PQ status of each MIS faculty in the College in spring 2005. Of the eight faculty members teaching accounting that semester, seven had full-time appointments. Seven were either academically or professionally qualified. The full-time faculty taught 97.1 percent of the total SCH generated in the MIS area. MIS Faculty Qualifications –Spring 2005 Rank, Degree, Qualification, Teaching Status, and MFTE Name Rank Degree Qua. Status FTE SCH Teaching Other Total Bell, R Assistant Ph.D. AQ FT .67 .67 180 Chen, W Assistant Ed. D. AQ FT .75 .25 1 174 Mahfouz, A Assistant Ph.D. AQ FT 1 1 246 Opara, E Assistant DBA AQ FT .67 .67 153 Tomiuk, D Assistant Doc. St. AQ FT .5 .5 1 141 Hinson, S Instructor MS PQ FT 1 1 318 Holloway, R Instructor MS PQ FT 1 1 294 Ballentine, W Instructor Doc. St. PQ PT .25 .25 45 Total FTE Credit Hours 5.84 .75 6.59 1551 Percentage of Total SCH Generate d by Full-Time Faculty = 97.10% Notes: For graduate faculty, the full-time load is defined as 9 SCH per semester effective spring 2005 Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 49 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Management Faculty Qualifications (Spring 2005) Rank, Degree, Qualification, Teaching Status, and MFTE Name Rank Degree Qua. Status FTE SCH Teaching Other Total Gupta, O. Professor PhD AQ FT 1 1 279 Bailey, H. Associate PhD PQ FT 0.5 0.5 1 213 Debnath, S. Associate DBA AQ FT 0.67 0.33 1 213 Nelson, G. Associate PhD FT 0.75 0.25 1 336 Sutanto, P. Associate PhD AQ FT 1 1 219 Bell, R. Assistant PhD AQ FT 0.33 0.33 111 Dyck, J. Assistant PhD PQ FT 0.33 0.67 1 66 Geismar, N. Assistant PhD AQ FT 1 1 324 White, L. Assistant PhD AQ FT 0.67 0.33 1 156 Liang, L. Instructor MS PQ FT 1 1 321 Sharma, S. Adjunct PhD FT 0.25 0.25 84 Adjunct MS PQ PT 0.25 0.25 90 Total FTE Credit Hours 7.75 2.08 9.83 2412 Total MFTE = 6.32, Actual FT Faculty = 9 Percentage of Total SCH Generated by Full-Time Faculty = 96.26% Notes: For graduate faculty, the full-time load is defined as 9 SCH per semester effective spring 2005 Dr. Opara taught 67% in the MIS department and is counted as a FT faculty in MIS area. Dr. Sharma taught 75% in economics and management areas and is counted as a FT faculty in economics area. Teaching Other Total Hill, Jeanne Professor Ph.D. AQ FT 1 1 243 Tandon, S Associate Ph.D. AQ FT .33 .67 1 96 Joonas, K Assistant Ph.D. 1 1 330 Opara, E Assistant DBA AQ FT .33 .33 111 Sharma, S Adjunct Ph.D. FT .25 .25 135 Total FTE Credit Hours 2.91 .67 3.58 915 Percentage of Total SCH Generate d by Full-Time Faculty = 100% Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 50 of 150 Prairie View A&M University time appointments in the College, and four faculty me mbers were either academically or professionally qualified; 100 percent of the SCH generated in Teaching Other Total Quddus, M. Professor PhD AQ FT 0 1 1 0 Soliman, M. Associate PhD AQ FT 0.75 0.25 1 312 Wallace, F. Associate PhD AQ FT 1 1 294 Langley, S. Assistant PhD AQ FT 1 1 240 Quazi, R. Assistant PhD AQ FT 1 1 342 Sharma, S. Adjunct PhD FT 0.5 0.5 150 Thiagarajan Instructor MA PT 0.5 0.5 213 Total FTE Credit Hours 2.91 0.67 3.58 1551 Total MFTE = 4.03, Actual FT Faculty = 6 Percentage of Total SCH Generated by Full-Time Faculty = 86.30% Tables FD.4.b-1 to FD.4.b-6 show that in spri ng 2005, the COB faculty in each major satisfied the AACSB standards on full-time faculty and academically or professionally qualified faculty. Even though economics is not a major, it is an important support area in the College and offers a minor. In the spring of 2005, for all disciplines in graduate programs in business, the full-time faculty generated 100 percent of the SCH. For the BBA, in each disciplin e the full-time faculty coverage of the SCH varied from 80 to 97 percent. Table FD.4.b-7 shows the MFTE and the actual FTE, AQ, and PQ faculty computations for each major area for the past three spring semesters (2003-2005). It is evident that in spring 2005, the College faculty composition was in compliance with the AACSB standa rds. The College had more FTE faculty than was required by the standard over this period, except in Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 51 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 52 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Percentages of SCH Taught by Full-Time Fa culty by Degree Programs and Disciplines (Spring 2003-2005) Degree Program: BBA Spring 2003 Spring 2004 Spring 2005 Total Taught by Total Taug ht by Total Taught by SCH FT faculty Percent SCH FT faculty Percent SCH FT faculty Percent 1182 1182 100.00 1338 1026 76.68 1425 1336 93.75 Economics 1686 1614 95.73 1356 1356 100.00 1371 1158 84.46 888 621 69.93 1002 480 47.90 1101 879 79.84 1620 1314 81.11 1452 1131 77.89 1455 1413 97.11 Management 1773 1688 95.21 1803 1803 100.00 2061 1971 95.63 TOTAL 7896 7166 90.75 7559 6444 84.80 8289 7633 92.09 Degree Program: MBA 84 84 100 0 0 0 183 183 100.00 Economics 96 96 100 111 111 100.00 180 180 100.00 201 201 100 201 201 100.00 198 198 100.00 105 0 0 108 0 0 96 96 100.00 Management 237 237 100 270 270 100.00 351 351 100.00 TOTAL 807 702 86.99 780 672 86.15 1047 1047 100.00 Degree Program: MSA Program did not exist N/A 120 120 100.00 57 57 100.00 FD.5. FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS FD.5.a. The faculty, in aggregate, should have suffi cient academic and professional qualifications to In recent years, the COB has recruited large number Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 53 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty 1. Total undergraduate semester credit hours (USCH) 8115 7896 9240 7599 9171 8289 2. Total graduate semester credit hours (GSCH) 798 807 794 900 1096 1047 3. Undergraduate minimum FTE req. (USCH/400) 20.29 19.74 23.10 19.00 22.93 20.72 4. Graduate minimum FTE req. (GSCH/300) 2.66 2.69 2.65 3.00 3.65 3.49 5. Total minimum FTE (MFTE) faculty req. (Items 3+4) 22.95 22.43 25.75 22.00 26.58 24.21 6. Actual number of FTE faculty 28.5 28 30 31.25 38.25 38.75 7. Actual FTE/ Minimum required FTE faculty 1.24 1.25 1.17 1.42 1.44 1.60 Full-Time/ AQ Full-Time Equivalent Faculty 8. Minimum full-time faculty required (Item 5X0.75) 17.21 16.82 19.31 16.50 19.94 18.16 9. Actual number of full-time faculty 25 25 27 28 35 37 10. Actual FT faculty/ Minimum FT faculty required 1.45 1.49 1.40 1.70 1.76 2.04 11. AQ MFTE - undergraduate faculty (Item 3x0.50) 10.14 9.87 11.55 9.50 11.46 10.36 12. AQ MFTE - graduate faculty (Item 4x0.75) 2.00 2.02 1.99 2.25 2.74 2.62 13. Total AQ MFTE faculty (Items 11+12) 12.14 11.89 13.54 11.75 14.20 12.92 14. Actual number of AQ FTE faculty 12.5 12.25 18.25 17.5 25.5 28 15. Actual AQ FTE/ Minimum AQ FTE faculty 1.03 1.03 1.35 1.49 1.80 2.16 Academically or Profession ally Qualified Faculty 16. Minimum AQ or PQ faculty req. (Item 5x0.90) 20.65 20.19 23.17 19.80 23.92 21.79 17. Actual number of AQ FTE faculty 12.5 12.25 18.25 17.5 25.5 28 18. Actual number of PQ FTE faculty 4.25 4 4.5 6 4 7 19. Actual no. of AQ or PQ FTE faculty (Items 17+18) 16.75 16.25 22.75 23.5 29.5 35 20. Actual AQ+PQ faculty/ Min. AQ+PQ faculty req. 0.81 0.80 0.98 1.19 1.23 1.61 Academically Qualified Faculty without Doctoral Degree 21. Max AQ FTE faculty w/o doctoral deg (Item 6x0.10) 2.85 2.80 3.0 3.13 3.83 3.88 22. Actual AQ FTE faculty w/o doctoral degree 1 1 3 2.5 2 1 Note: The SCH data include economics area courses. Ec onomics is a service area and offers a minor area of study. Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 54 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The College has come a long way in removing the w eaknesses identified in the Accreditation Plan. The table below presents the improvements in the faculty development area. Weaknesses Identified in the Candidacy Plan Current Status Several senior faculty members have not produced enough research to be academically qualified. With minor exceptions, all senior faculty members now have an active research agenda. Most have published in recent years. Many faculty are not engaged in intellectual contributions. Most full-time faculty members are currently contributions and have Faculty size is small with only 20 full-time faculty members . Full-time faculty size has increased to 37 (spring 2005) from 20 in fall 2002, reducing the dependence on adjunct faculty. Three faculty members are working on their At least three faculty members have successfully Faculty overload teaching is prevalent. This practice has been discontinued; most tenure-track faculty have a reduced (3+3) In accounting, only 50% of the faculty are AQ or academically or professionally qualified. Faculty-related policies and procedures are lacking and not available for easy access. New policies have been developed and included COB Faculty Handbook made available to each new faculty during orientation. Evidence of Continuous Improvement The Prairie View A&M University College of Busin ess has successfully rebuilt its faculty over the past three years. The faculty size has increased by 85 per cent from fall 2001 to spring 2005. This recruitment Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 55 of 150 Prairie View A&M University A majority of current faculty members have been recruited during this dramatic phase of growth and continuous improvement. The recent faculty recru itment efforts have improved the gender and racial diversity of the overall faculty. In spring 2005, there were eight women and five minorities on the faculty. Based on the MFTE and FTE criteria, the Colle ge exceeds all of the standards. The dependence on adjunct faculty members is strategic, based on budg Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 56 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 57 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.1. CURRICULUM CONTENT C.1.1: Both undergraduate and MBA curricula shou ld provide an understanding of perspectives ess. Coverage should include: Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 58 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.1-1 Coverage of Business Perspectives in the BBA Curriculum Perspectives AACSB Content Area GENERAL EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT IN PHIL 2023 Ethics* M ECON 2113 Principles of Microeconomics E S S S S ECON 2123 Principles of Macroeconomics E E E S S MISY 1013 Introduction to Computer Information Systems S E MGMT 3013 Business Statistics S S BUSINESS CORE REQUIREMENTS ACCT 2113 Financial Accounting S S M S ACCT 2123 Managerial Accounting S S S S FINA 2203 Legal Environment of Business S S E E M S S S FINA 3103 Principles of Finance S S S S S S MGMT 1013 Introduction to Business E S S S S S S S MGMT 3103 Principles of Management E S S S S S S S MGMT 4303 Strategic Mgmt. & Business Policy S S S S S S S S MGMT 4333 Production & Operations Mgmt. E S S S E MISY 3303 Business Communication S S E E S S S S Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 59 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.1-2 Coverage of Business Perspectives in the MBA Curriculum Perspectives AACSB Content Area CORE (PREREQUISITE) REQUIREMENTS ACCT 5003 Concepts of Accounting S S S S E S S ECON 5003 Concepts of Economic Analysis S E E E S FINA 5003 Concepts of Finance S E S E FINA 5013 Legal Environment of Business S S E E M S S MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management* E S S S S S S S MGMT 5113 Business Statistics MBA REQUIRED COURSES ACCT 5103 Managerial Accounting S S S S S ECON 5103 Managerial Economics S E S E E S FINA 5103 Theory of Financial Management S E S E E MGMT 5103 Organizational Behavior E S S S S S MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis E MGMT 5323 Strategy and Policy S S S S S S S S MGMT 5433 Prod. & Operations Management S S E MISY 5203 Managerial Communication S S S E S S S S MISY 5513 Management Information Systems S S S E *The course has been recently added based on the comments from the mock visit team. Note: S = some coverage of topic (at least equiva lent to one 50-minute class period or assignment), to a full week of classes or multiple assignments), M = major component of the course C.1.2: Undergraduate Business Program C.1.2.a: Each undergraduate curriculum should ha ve a general education component that normally comprises at least 50 percent of the student’s four-year program. At Prairie View A&M University, general education consists of 42 SCH, including introductions to history, political science, and other sciences, in addition to mathemati cs and composition. As part of general education, business students must take PSYC 1113 (General Psychology) and MISY 1013 Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 60 of 150 Prairie View A&M University (Introduction to Management Information Systems) among other courses to satisfy the behavior/social science and computing requirements. General educa tion is supplemented by an additional 21 SCH of general education supplement that includes courses in economics and statistics offered by the COB. Every business student seeking a BBA degree must take 30 SCH of COB courses regardless of their chosen major or area of specialization. Students take additional courses to satisfy their selected major or area of specialization within the BBA degree. Table C.1.2.a-1 presents the BBA degree requirements classified into four areas—general education (42 SCH), general education supplement (21 SCH), busin ess core (30 SCH), and major (30 SCH). Courses (63 SCH) in both General Educati on and General Education Supplement constitute the general education component. Thus, the above standard is satisfied since the general education component (63 SCH) comprises at least 50 percent of the 123 SCH requ ired for the BBA program at Prairie View A&M University. Bachelor of Business Administration Curriculum General General ENGL 1123 & 1133 6 SPCH 1003 3 MATH 1113, 1153 & 2153 3 6 SCIENCE 6 HUM. & VIS. PERF. ARTS 6 HIST 1313 & 1323 6 POSC 1113 & 1123 6 PSYC 1113 3 PHIL 2023/MGMT2203 3 ECON 2113 & 2123, ECON 9 MISY 1013 3 MGMT 3013 Statistics 3 ACCT 2113 & 2123 6 MISY 3303 Bus. Comm. 3 FINA 2203 & 3103 6 MGMT 1013, 3103, 4303, & 12 MRKT 3103 3 MAJOR REQUIREMENTS 21-30 UNRESTRICTED ELECTIVES 0-9 TOTALS 42 21 30 30 TOTAL REQ. FOR BBA 123 Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 61 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.1.2.b: The curriculum should include foundation knowledge for business in the following areas: mathematics, and statistics. As shown in Table C.1.2.b-1, more than half of the 123 SCH required in the BBA program address foundational knowledge in acc ounting, behavioral and social sciences, economics, and mathematics and Table C.1.2.b-1 Coverage of Skills and Foundations in the BBA Curriculum Skills Foundations AACSB Content Area Written Communication Oral Communication Quantitative Analysis Computer Usage Accounting Behavioral Science Economics Mathematics & GENERAL EDUCATION & GENERAL EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT REQUIREMENTS ENGL 1123 Freshman Composition I M ENGL 1133 Freshman Composition II M SPCH 1003 Fundamentals of Speech Communication M MATH 1113 College Algebra M MATH 1153 Finite Math M MATH 2153 Calculus for Bus/Soc/Life Sciences M ECON 2113 Principles of Microeconomics S S S E M ECON 2123 Principles of Macroeconomics S S S E M ECON (Elective) E M HIST 1313 The U.S. to 1876 M HIST 1323 The U.S.—1876 to Present M POSC 1113 American Government I M POSC 1123 American Government II M PSYC 1113 General Psychology M MISY 1013 Intro. to Computer Information Systems S M MGMT 3013 Business Statistics E S M E M Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 62 of 150 Prairie View A&M University BUSINESS CORE REQUIREMENTS ACCT 2113 Financial Accounting S M S M ACCT 2123 Managerial Accounting S S E S M FINA 2203 Legal Environment S S FINA 3103 Principles of Finance S E S E S MGMT 1013 Introduction to Business S S E MGMT 3103 Principles of Management E E S E MGMT 4303 Strategic Mgmt. & Business Policy E E E MGMT 4333 Production & Operations Mgmt. S S E S M MISY 3303 Business Communication M M E Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 63 of 150 Prairie View A&M University communication skills of business students through suppor t from professional staff and tutors. Faculty can require students to visit tutors in the CBC to cr itique drafts of written assignments such as business General Education & General Education Supplement ECON 2113 Principles of Micro. Econ EQ, PW, HW, QZ CD ECON 2123 Principles of Macro. Econ EQ, PW, HW, QZ CD MISY 1013 Introduction to CIS EQ, HW, QZ MGMT 3013 Business Statistics EQ, HW CD Business Core ACCT 2113 Financial Acct. EQ, HW, QZ ACCT 2123 Managerial Acct. EQ, HW, PW, QZ CD FINA 2203 Legal Environment EQ, CA, QZ CD FINA 3103 Principles of Finance EQ, HW, QZ MGMT 1013 Introduction to Business EQ, PW, HW CP, CD MGMT 3103 Principles of Mgmt EQ, PW, QZ CP, CD MGMT 4303 St. Mgmt & B. Policy EQ, QZ, PW CP, CD MGMT 4333 Production & Op. Mgmt EQ, HW, QZ CD MISY 3303 Business Communication EQ, HW, PW, QZ CP, CD, QZ, CA Note: CP = class presentation (group presentation), CA = case analysis, PW = project and written report (research paper), EQ = examination questions, CD = class discussion (observation), QZ = quizzes, HW = homework C.1.2.d: The school should state additional req Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 64 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Except for accounting, each major w ithin the BBA program allows a de gree of flexibility in curriculum through elective courses. The choice of elective co urses also creates some flexibility necessary for the deployment of faculty resources, and allows the College to take advantage of in dividual faculty expertise and the development of new course offerings. Minor fields of study offered by the College of Business include accounting, business administration, economics, finance, international business, manageme Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 65 of 150 Prairie View A&M University instructors to post online syllabi, course materials, and gr ades. It also allows the students to interact with faculty and fellow students in discussion forums Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 66 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.3.a-1 Coverage of Skills and Core Areas in the MBA Curriculum Skills AACSB Core Areas AACSB Content Area Computer Usage CORE (PREREQUISITE) REQUIREMENTS ACCT 5003 Concepts of Accounting S E S M ECON 5003 Concepts of Economic Analysis S S E S S M M FINA 5003 Concepts of Finance E S E E M FINA 5013 Legal Environment of Business S S MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management* S S S M MGMT 5113 Business Statistics S M E S MBA REQUIRED COURSES ACCT 5103 Managerial Accounting S S E S M ECON 5103 Managerial Economics E S M E FINA 5103 Theory of Financial Management S S E E M S MGMT 5103 Organizational Behavior E E S S M MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis S M E MGMT 5323 Strategy and Policy E S S S S E E MGMT 5433 Prod. & Operations Management S E S M MISY 5203 Managerial Communications M M E E MISY 5513 Management Information Systems E E S M E *The course has been recently added based on the comments from the mock visit team. Note: S = some coverage of topic (at least equiva lent to one 50-minute class period or assignment), to a full week of classes or multiple assignments), M = major component of the course Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 67 of 150 Prairie View A&M University A student with an undergraduate background that incl udes subject content equivalent to courses in the MBA core may be exempted from a few selected co re courses. Specific course requirements for each ACCT 5003 Concepts of Accounting 3 ECON 5003 Concepts of Economics 3 FINA 5003 Concepts of Finance 3 FINA 5013 Legal Environment of Business 3 MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management* 3 MGMT 5113 Business Statistics 3 ACCT 5103 Managerial Accounting 3 MISY 5203 Managerial Communication 3 MISY 5513 Managerial Info. Sys. 3 ECON 5103 Managerial Economics 3 FINA 5103 Financial Management 3 MGMT 5103 Organizational Behavior 3 MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis 3 MGMT 5433 Production & Operations 3 MGMT 5323 Strategy & Policy 3 FINA 5313 Investment Management 3 ECON 5313 International Trade 3 FINA 5333 International Finance 3 MGMT 5343 Human Resources 3 MGMT 5613 Special Topics 3 MGMT 5353 Entrepreneurship 3 TOTAL 21 30 6 * The 2005-2007 adds a new course, MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management, to the MBA core. This increases the MBA core hours from 18 to 21 SCH. The course was introduced in response Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 68 of 150 Prairie View A&M University to a suggestion made by the mock visit team to stre ngthen the core knowledge coverage in this part of the program. C.1.3.c: Basic skills in written and oral communi cation, quantitative analysis, and computer usage should be achieved either by prior experien ce and education, or as part of the MBA curriculum. Basic written and oral communication, quantitative an alysis, and computer usage skills are normally developed by the undergraduate curriculum. St udents seeking admission to the MBA program must present evidence of a bachelor’s degree, or equivalent, as part of the application process. The expectation is that students will present evidence of courses in English composition a nd speech, mathematics, statistics, and computer applications. Table C.1.3. c-1 describes the basic skill Written Communication Composition I and II Business Communication ENGL 1123, ENGL 1133, Oral Communication Fundamentals of Speech SPCH 1003 Quantitative Analysis Basic Mathematics and MATH 1113, MATH 1153, MATH 2153, MGMT 3013 Computer Usage Computer Applications MISY 1013 Students interested in the MBA program must de monstrate their English language proficiency by submitting a 1,000-word essay that describes why they ar e interested in a graduate degree in business. International students must also submit Test of Engl ish as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) scores of 550 or Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 69 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.1.3.e: The curriculum should integrate th e core areas and apply cross-functional approaches to organizational issues. Integration of the curriculum at the graduate leve l is an important goal. The curriculum has been designed to ensure such integration. The MBA degr ee program includes a capstone course with the formal role of providing an integrative learning experience in the functional business areas. For example, the specific purpose of MGMT 5323 (Strategy and Policy) is to provide the student with a capstone integrative experience. The course description in the reads, “This course is the MBA capstone which synthesizes and integrates material from the va rious functions of business as it presents itself to organizational strategic managers.” The existence of the capstone course in the MBA curriculum does not preclude other courses from riences. Several business professors use Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 70 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.4.b-1 MSA Curriculum COURSES CORE REQUIRED ELECTIVE ACCT 2113 Financial Accounting 3 ACCT 2123 Managerial Accounting 3 ACCT 3213 Intermediate Accounting I 3 ACCT 3223 Intermediate Accounting II 3 ACCT 3333 Federal Income Tax I 3 ACCT 4223 Auditing 3 ACCT 5113 Advanced Auditing 3 ACCT 5123 Accounting Information Sys. 3 ACCT 5133 Accounting Managerial Dec. 3 ACCT 5143 Accounting Theory 3 ACCT 5153 Seminar Tax 3 MISY 5203 Managerial Communication 3 MISY 5513 Managerial Information Sys. 3 ECON 5103 Managerial Economics 3 ECON 5313 International Trade 3 FINA 5103 Financial Management 3 FINA 5313 Investment Analysis 3 FINA 5333 International Finance 3 MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis 3 MGMT 5343 Human Resources 3 MGMT 5353 Entrepreneurship 3 MGMT 5433 Production & Operations 3 TOTAL 18 21 9 Students with adequate prior preparation take 30 SC Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 71 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.2. CURRICULUM PLANNING AND EVALUATION C.2.1. Curriculum Planning C.2.1.: The curriculum for each degree program sh ould be the result of a curriculum planning process and should be consistent with the school’s mission. The Curriculum Planning Process The academic programs offered by the College of Busi ness are fully consistent with the missions of the University and the College. Furthermore, the business curriculum is in compliance with state requirements in higher education. The curriculum is sensitive to the context of contemporary business. The College faculty as a whole has primary responsib ility for the curriculum. However, the Curriculum Committee and the Graduate Committee are primarily responsible for monitoring the various curricula and for implementing the formal process of curricular change. Curriculum Change and Review Process The faculty in the College of Business has developed curri cula that are flexible a nd that adjust to changes in the business environment. Each discipline is represented by a discipline coordi Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 72 of 150 Prairie View A&M University as a special topics course. The Curriculum Committee has been requested to consider developing a freshman-level professional development course that w ould be mandatory for all business majors. This is in line with the revised mission that mentions th e College’s commitment to produce graduates who are readily employable. The Committee is also consid ering a fundamentals of economics course for non- business students. Lastly, a pilot program to offe r “honors” sections of a number of business courses was launched in spring 2005 semester. A Principles of Macroeconomics section was offered as an honors section, with 20 students only and a high emphasis on building students’ writing skills. Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 73 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Exhibit C.2.1-1 New Course/Program Approval Process Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 74 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.2.2. Monitoring of Programs for Effectiveness C.2.2: Each degree program should be systema tically monitored to assess its effectiveness and should be revised to reflect new objectives and to incorporate improvements based on contemporary theory and practice. The College of Business has implemented a plan for the collection of input from various stakeholders using questionnaires on the effectiveness of programs o ffered by the College. These stakeholders include alumni, Dean’s Advisory Board members, recruiters, the College of Business faculty, and current College of Business students. All the inform ation collected from the stakeholders is reviewed each fall semester Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 75 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.2.2-1 EBI Survey Results—Closing the Assessment Loop Issues Actions Taken Additional Recommendation Send more instructors for training offered by CIBERs for teaching and research on international business Quality of Classrooms New furnitu re (tables, chairs, desks, and lab chairs), new technology Advising Fall 2004 pre-registration student survey reveals a 91.5% “highly satisfactory” rating by respondents Assign students to faculty advisors by major to utilize the expertise of faculty in their specific field; create position for a full-time advisor Insufficient Computer New full-time computer systems person hired; student monitors hired; new computer lab added with 35 computers. Increase lab hours; consider weekend lab hours; increase access to other Some Dissatisfaction Higher admission standards to COB have been implemented; guidelines for classroom behavior developed; a writing intensive honors section Create the pilot honors program; emphasize reading Quality of Faculty and New faculty hires; emphasis on training (teaching seminars); pilot honors program Survey students to pinpoint Studying Faculty encouraged to raise standards; encourage students to take advantage of tutorial services; emphasis on work Placement and Career New staff for recruitment and In fall 2003 and spring 2004, the COB faculty be gan the process of strengthening the assurance of learning. Following a workshop on course-embedded assessment given by a former dean of Texas A&M University-Commerce, the business faculty worked on Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 76 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.2.2-2 COB Assessment Efforts—Closing the Loop Assessment Instrument Date(s) Closing the Loop EBI/AACSB Surveys of Academic Experience Spring 2002, 2003, 2004, Results analyzed and shared with faculty committees Course-Embedded Assessment of Core Spring 2004, fall 2004, spring 2005 Results collected each semester and Results shared with faculty committees Curriculum Committee and discipline coordinators asked to monitor and recommend interventions, when necessary Process is new and ongoing Advising Satisfaction Survey Each semester during the advising period Results of the anonymous survey tabulated and shared with all faculty members Used for evaluation and improvement Policy changes made as a result of student changes (web registration, specific faculty advisor, professional advisor) Student Evaluation of At the end of each regular semester; all courses The computerized instrument is sent to University Institutional Research and results shared with each faculty The COB open-ended instrument collected and later shared with faculty effectiveness, planning, and policy New Faculty Orientation Survey Fall 2003, fall 2004, spring 2005 Given to new faculty after all the elements of their orientation are over Results shared with department heads for improving the orientation process Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 77 of 150 Prairie View A&M University area of curriculum. The table below shows how Lack of Standardization of content coverage of multi-section courses Discipline coordinators have been appointed to work with faculty and department heads on assessment and content coverage; in some disciplines, faculty use a common final exam in multi-section courses. All core courses have common learning goals developed by the faculty and used to assess learning. Insufficient coverage of diversity, political, social, regulatory, communication, global, and No established planning process to assure that the curriculum for each major accurately reflects the College’s mission Several majors and the graduate curriculum have been extensively reviewed. Necessary changes have been introduced. The MIS faculty recently implemented an extensive review and modernization of the MIS curriculum to reflect the mission of Lack of integration within the curricula Besides the capstone course, integration of the functional disciplines takes place in several courses in the undergraduate a nd graduate programs. Several faculty use business plans, case studies, Business Week, Evidence of Continuous Improvement In recent years, the undergraduate and graduate curri cula have been considerably strengthened. The College believes that high-quality programs and processes in place to en sure continuous improvement in the curricula. A few highlights are presented below: The admission standards have been strengthened w ith a two-step process that would eventually require all students interested in studying busin ess to first satisfy the minimum requirements, including a GPA of 2.30, before being formally admitted. All courses in the BBA program were thoroughly reviewed in the 2002-2003 academic year for content, prerequisites, and duplications with feedback from the Advisory Board. Discipline coordinators have been appointed Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 78 of 150 Prairie View A&M University After a training workshop on course-embedded assessment in fall 2003, faculty approved an Assessment Plan that has been implemented over the Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 79 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 80 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The dean’s complex includes three offices, one of which is used for placement and development purposes; a 25-seat conference room equipped with technology and used by faculty and students; a faculty and staff lounge also available to graduate st udents; a kitchen; and othe r facilities. In fall 2004, used by the Research Foundation. The new rooms have been converted into much-need ed faculty offices, space for the Small Business Development Center, and a student lounge. A large reading room serves as the home of the Center for Business Communications (CBC) and tutors, and has several computer terminals with access to the Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 81 of 150 Prairie View A&M University COB Student Access to Computing Facilities and Library Resources The COB faculty members are fully committed to using the best technology to enhance their instruction and to build the skills of business graduates. Th e COB administration has aggressively invested in technology in recent years, and these efforts have b een well funded. Faculty members are encouraged and rewarded for innovative instruction using tech nology, including the use of PowerPoint, distance Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 82 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The COB provides technical support for business faculty, staff, and students. The computer specialist employs several student workers. Sufficient training is provided for the technical support personnel to solve the problems related to multimedia classrooms and teaching labs. The COB IT office provides the following technical support for academic and administrative computing: monitor the COB information technology needs in cluding hardware, software, servicing, security, Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 83 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The Library’s open stacks, online catalog, refere nce assistance, support equipment, and seating availability encourage maximum use of facilities by all users. The building has five floors. One houses the public service areas, two contain open book st acks, one accommodates a ga llery, and another holds Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 84 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Space, Facilities, and Staff Support As described previously, the COB has adequate space, Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 85 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Center for Business Communication: 2002 - 2005 Semester Event Personnel Impact/Data Recruitment and hiring of Faculty coordinator. Initial CBC documentation begins. Formal CBC documents developed. Dr. Reginald L. Bell, assistant professor of business comm. was hired by the COB Initially, student response was weak due to lack of awareness. Fewer than 20 students visited the Center looking for help with their writing. Fall 2002 Hired and trained one tutor. A student tutor was hired. Grant proposal submitted to the Houston Endowment. Spring/Summer 2003 Hired and trained three tutors. Hired a professional with 30+ years of experience as assistant coordinator to work 20 hours per week. Mrs. Edwina Garcia, a Fall 2003 Professional documentation became possible and systematic data collection was organized, scheduled and collected. Fifteen minutes pre and post diagnostic writing samples were taken. Dr. Bell and Mrs. Garcia began sampling writings from two Introduction to Business Courses & two Business Communication courses and rewarding student visitation to the Students made nearly 500 visits to the CBC. A visitation log was developed to document students’ visits. Spring 2004 Pre- and post-diagnostic writing samples continue. Four tutors were hired and trained. Dr. Bell and Mrs. Garcia continued sampling the writing of all students enrolled in three business communication courses. A reward system was developed to encourage students’ visitation to the The data from one-year operation resulted in significant findings and a research report written. Fall 2004 Pre- and post-diagnostic writing samples continue. Three tutors were hired and trained. Dr. Bell and Mrs. Garcia continued sampling the writing of all students enrolled in two Business Communication courses. A reward system encouraged students’ visitation to the Students made nearly 500 visits to Fall 2004 Pre- and post-diagnostic writing samples continue. Three tutors were hired and trained. Dr. Bell and Mrs. Garcia continued sampling the writing of all students enrolled in two Business Communication courses. The data from one-year operation resulted in a co-authored paper by Dr. Bell & Dr. Quddus (2004) titled, “Impact of the Center for Business Communication.” The paper is in revise-resubmit stage at the Journal of Business and Technical Communication. Spring 2005 Pre- and post-diagnostic writing samples continue. Three tutors were hired and trained. Dr. Bell and Mrs. Edwina Garcia continued sampling the writing of all students enrolled in two Business Communication courses. Students made 505 visits to the Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 86 of 150 Prairie View A&M University IN.2 COLLECTIVE FACULTY INSTR UCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN.2: The School’s faculty in aggregate and the faculty’s sub-units are responsible for: Effective creation and delivery of instruction Evaluation of instructional effectiveness and student achievement Continued improvement of instructional programs Effective Creation and Delivery of Instruction The COB faculty members recognize that effective creation and delivery of instruction is their responsibility. Faculty members must demonstrate the effectiveness of their teaching in the portfolio required for performance evaluations. Processes are in pl ace to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction on an ongoing basis, and to ensure hi gh-quality and continuous in novations in teaching and learning. Merit raise, tenure and promotion guidelines are designed to reward superior teaching. Overall, ittee (IRRC), a standing committee of the COB, is responsible for making policy recommendations regard ing instruction. The Curriculum Committee works in close tandem with the IRRC and COB administration to ensure the curriculum is current and of high quality. The major policies regarding instruction a Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 87 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Evaluation of Instructional Eff ectiveness and Student Achievement The COB systematically evaluates faculty performance to gauge instructional effectiveness. Independent assessment of student learning and achieveme Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 88 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Continuous Improvement of Instructional Programs and important to every business faculty member’s tenure and promotion review, post- tenure review and reappointment decision for non-tenure-track faculty. For annual pe rformance evaluations for merit raises, teaching receives a weight of 50 percent. The department head s take into consideration their own assessment based on classroom visitation and the beginning-of-the-year goals that each faculty member submits. The Annual Performance Evaluation is a University instrument, but has been modified by the College to fit its unique mission and needs. The COB faculty evaluation process demonstrates the College’s commitment to continuous improvement of its instructional programs. The performance evaluation takes place at various le vels. The Faculty Composition and Development Committee conducts an independent ev aluation of the performance of each tenure-track faculty member on a fixed schedule depending on the tenure calendar. Additionally, the dean and department head Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 89 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Innovations in Instructional Practices MGMT 3103 Principles of Manageme nt Dr. White Small Group Learning Business Plan & Group Presentation (dyads ECON 2113 Principles of Microeconomics Dr Langley In-class exercises, Written assign., Socratic ECON 2123 Principles of Macroeconomics Dr. Quazi Dr. Langley ECON 2123 Principles of Macro. (Honors Dr. Langley Writing Intensive, Small Class, Honors MISY 3303 Business Communication FINA 2103 Personal Financial Planning WebCT-Quizzing/Grading, Pre-recorded FINA 3103 Principles of Finance Group project on financial analysis of companies FINA 4313 Investment Dr. Yang Investment Portfolio Game ECON 4343 International Trade Dr. Quazi Socratic method & Written Assignments MISY 5203 Managerial Communication MISY 5513 Management Information Systems Case Studies, Team Work, Team Presentations, Assignments based on Library's Online Databases for Research, and Oral and Written Communication MGMT 5353 Entrepreneurship (new name) Dr. Dyck Case studies & Group Projects, local and MGMT 5343 Human Resource Management Dr. Dyck Problem-based learning MGMT 5323 Strategy and Policy Dr. Gupta Simulation Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 90 of 150 Prairie View A&M University IN.3. INDIVIDUAL FACULTY INSTRUCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN.3: Individual faculty members are responsible for: Currency in their instructional field (s) Delivery of effective instruction Accessibility to students consiste All COB faculty members are expected to be current in their respec tive fields of instruction, innovative in their teaching methods, and accessible to students in and out of class. Individual faculty members are responsible for currency in their instructional fields. Faculty members who are not current or are found to be ineffective in the classroom receive lower merit ra ises, may be denied tenure or promotion, and may not be reappointed. One of the best ways for faculty to stay current in th eir field of teaching is to have an active research agenda. Faculty performance evaluations, which ar e conducted annually, include a section regarding current intellectual activities and contri butions made by the faculty member during the year. Over the last four years, faculty intellectual contributions have increased substantially. Many faculty members are involved in research and publishing on teaching and learning issues. The average number of peer- reviewed journal articles for each full-time faculty member during the past five years is 3.67; counting all forms of peer-reviewed intellectual contributions, the average is 14.13. The cumulative five-year total portfolio of intellectual contributions for the faculty is roughly 500, with many contributions related to instructional topics. Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 91 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Professional and Institutional Guidelines for Faculty (Sources: Adapted from 'Ethical Principles in Uni Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 92 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Delivery of Effective Instruction The business faculty members are fully committed to th e College’s mission of excellence in teaching and the student learning experience. Faculty members eagerly participate in activities to improve their teaching effectiveness and to be innovative. In recent years, new courses have been developed and taught by faculty in management, finance, and MIS. Seve ral online undergraduate- a nd graduate-level courses have been developed and taught by business faculty. In the future, several more online courses will be offered. Faculty teams are working on collaborative r esearch in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Each semester, the IRRC organizes brown bag seminars. In the past faculty members and outside experts have conducted these seminars in the COB, and they have been well attended. Table In.3-1 includes information on recent brown bag discussions. Busin ess faculty members have attended workshops on PowerPoint and WebCT, offered by the COB and the University’s Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. Table IN.3-1 presents information on th e brown bag seminars on teaching organized by the Instruction Resources and Responsibilities Committee. Brown Bag Discussions on Teaching (2003-2005) PROFESSOR TOPIC DATE Dr. Larry White Dr. Jan Jasper Using WebCT in Your Class December 3, Readability Appropriateness of Classroom Dr. Munir Quddus The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (Pedagogical Research) April 7, 2004 Drs. Henri Bailey & Munir Dr. John Dyck Learning Style Differences October 4, 2004 Learning Objectives November 29, Dr. Kishwar Joonas Achieving Effectiveness in Work Teams: Time January 18, 2005 Dr. John Dyck ‘Minute’ Papers Prove Their Worth Again March 16, 2005 Dr. Munir Quddus April 6, 2005 Individual faculty members are responsible for de livering effective instruction. Instructional effectiveness is evaluated by use of Student Opinion Surveys and direct observation by department heads. Through the use of current textbooks, reliable testing instruments, group projects, well-specified program goals linked to course-embedded learning objectives, and in-house teacher training, COB faculty work to increase their effectiveness in th e classroom to improve student learning. Additionally, the COB Teaching Professor Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 93 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Effective management of the classroom is an importa nt part of the faculty responsibility. Given nationwide trends on campuses in st Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 94 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Faculty at the time of signing their contract al so sign a document called Minimal Instructional Responsibilities shared by the provost’s office. The document emphasizes the accountability and basic fundamentals of effective instruction. Student Accessibility to Faculty PVAMU requires that each faculty member hold re gularly scheduled conference (office) hours. The COB faculty members are required to schedule at le ast one conference hour for each hour of scheduled teaching. Conference hours are reported to the dean’s office and posted on each faculty member’s office door. Many faculty members serve as advisors to stud ent organizations. Professors are available to assist students by email or by appointment. Students inter ested in internships rela ted to a specific degree program are entitled to enroll in an internship course with the department head. A faculty supervisor is assigned to each student taking an internship course. Several students work as student assistants whereby With the COB open-ended student evaluation instru ment, students are invited to comment on faculty availability and engagement in and outside the cl assroom. The College c onducts anonymous student faculty evaluation surveys during the academic advi Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 95 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The following tables describes how the weaknesses id entified in the Accreditation Plan have been successfully ameliorated in the area of inst Weaknesses Identified in the Accreditation Plan (Summer 2002) Current Status (Summer 2005) Not all faculty members have established learning objectives, mandatory topics, optional topics, and assessment criteria for multi-section core courses. Common learning goals for each course in the business core have been implemented by the discipline faculty; an Assessment Plan was approved in Spring 2004; Discipline coordinators appointed to There are no established criteria for assessing the quality of the curricula at the undergraduate The course-embedded assessment of the learning goals, Major Field Test and the EBI survey are being used to monitor and benchmark the curricula and student learning; an assessment coordinator has been Data collected in the undergraduate and graduate survey and the Major Field Test have not been used for curriculum changes and program development. Results have been analyzed and discussed resulting in curricula changes such as enhanced coverage, new courses, strengthening the admission standards, honors sections, and increased emphasis on writing Faculty members need to be more involved in growing faculty. Ten new office spaces in Hobart Taylor received from the another department in fall 2004; There is a shortage of classroom space (peak A previously unused room was converted to a new Teaching assistants are unavailable to faculty for assistance. Each department allotted $10,000 a year for student workers; four graduate teaching assistants available each semester No systematic program is in place to collect feedback from alumni and employers to evaluate effectiveness of instruction. EBI alumni survey has been purchased and is being sent out (summer 2005) for feedback on curriculum; Advisory Board members surveyed on curriculum Evidence of Continuous Improvement Teaching is our first priority, with an assigned weight of 50 percent in the faculty evaluation process. The College expects each faculty member to be sensitive to the needs of st udents and to strive for excellence in teaching. Faculty emphasize skill-building assignm ents and teach a modern curriculum. The COB mission broadly encompasses all activities that enha knowledge, including instructional materials and classroom presentations. We seek interdisciplinary alliances across the campus and with outside businesses to enhance the overall education of students as effective leaders and citizens. We seek to attract and educate capable and motivated students for futu re leadership in business and industry. Our graduates will be aware of the fundamental aspects of decision making in an increasingly complex and technology-driven global bus iness environment. The curriculum and programs Self-Evaluation Report Instru ibility College of Business Page 96 of 150 Prairie View A&M University at the undergraduate and graduate level are designed to educate and develop future business leaders at different stages of their careers. Some significan t improvements in instructional resources follow. Classrooms have been significantly upgraded with new multimedia technology, access to the Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 97 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 98 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table S.1.a-1 Notes: * PVAMU is in the midst of a $30M Capital Ca mpaign that is scheduled to conclude by 2008. Pledges have been received and co mmitments have been partially funde d to date. Available scholarship funds for the 2005-06 academic year are based on the interest that accrues on the principal that has already been received. Available scholarship am ounts for the 2008-09 academic year are based on the interest that will accrue on the principal that has been pledged and should be received by 2008. S.1.b. The school should demonstrate continuous efforts to achieve demographic diversity in its Student Demographic Diversity S.1.b-2 present the University and COB student demographics in spring 2005. Given the University’s long history as a premier historically black college and university, a majority of students enrolled in the University and the College are Africa n-American. However, the student population is well diversified in terms of gender, academic preparedness and socio-economic status. The University and the College have responded in several ways to th e “Closing the Gaps” initiative, endorsed by the Coordination Board and TAMUS, to increase the number of students of Hispanic heritage in the public universities. The College remains fully committed Freshmen TransferUndergraduateGraduate 2008* Annual Scholarships X X X X $20,000.00 $50,000.00 Textbook Scholarship X X $250.00 $500.00 Robert Woods Memorial Scholarship Endow. X X $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Scholarship Endow. X X X X $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Scholarship Endow. X X X X $100.00 $2,500.00 E.J. Tyler Memorial Scholarship Endow. X X X X $250.00 $250.00 William M. Green Scholarship Endow. X X X X $5,000.00 $52,500.00 Illinois Tool Works Scholarship Endow. X X X X $2,500.00 $12,500.00 TOTAL $33,100.00 $123,250.00 Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 99 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Although reshaping the pattern of demographic divers ity will take time and effort, the University has made significant strides in achieving diversity. Responding to its designation as a “ special purpose Total UG/G Male % Female % TOTAL % Male % Female % TOTAL % White 88 3 115 4 203 4 64 10 118 7 182 8 Black 2307 90 2931 91 5238 91 518 81 1413 87 1931 86 Hispanic 80 3 95 3 175 3 15 2 40 2 55 2 Asian 21 1 40 1 61 1 7 1 16 1 23 1 American Indian 2 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 International 57 2 35 1 92 2 31 5 18 1 49 2 Unknown 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 7 0 10 0 Total 2556 100 3219 100 5775 100 639 100 1615 100 2254 100 *Data includes full-time and part-time students. Percent co lumns show rounded figures and may not add to 100. Table S.1.b-2 Total UG/G Male % Female % TOTAL % Male % Female % TOTAL % White 8 2 4 1 12 1 4 5 4 4 8 5 Black 420 94 340 94 760 94 67 87 87 90 154 89 Hispanic 9 2 11 3 20 2 0 0 2 2 2 1 Asian 3 1 4 1 7 1 3 4 3 3 6 3 American Indian 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 International 6 1 3 1 9 1 3 4 1 1 4 2 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 447 100 362 100 809 100 77 100 97 100 174 100 *Data includes full-time and part-time students. Percent co lumns show rounded figures and may not add to 100. Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 100 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Given the firm commitment of TAMUS and that of University’s central administration, the ongoing efforts to achieve demographic diversity at the Un iversity are serious and will be productive. The University’s student population (freshman and transfer students) derives largely from the state of Texas (approximately 85 percent). The vast majority of these students hail from large metropolitan areas such as Houston, Dallas, Galveston, Beaumont, Austin a nd San Antonio. A significant percentage of our student population is from rural areas in southeast Tex as and areas within a seventy-five mile radius of the aforementioned urban areas. The College of Business also draws transfer students from area community colleges, such as Houston Community Co llege System, Blinn Community College and North Harris Montgomery County Community District. Several public and private four-year universities also represent current and potential future sources of transfer students. Growth in the COB is projected to be at least six pe rcent annually in keeping with the University’s efforts to increase the student population to 15,000 by th Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 101 of 150 Prairie View A&M University For the spring 2005 semester there were 174 student s registered in the graduate programs in business. All students are registered as part-time students, since the program is designed for the working adult. 19 (11%) were registered in the MSA degree program 159 (89%) were registered in the MBA degree program Source: COB Student Survey Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 102 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Business faculty and administration are committed to increasing student demographic diversity. In the Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 103 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table S.1.b-3 Recent Recruitment Events in the COB Date(s) Event Brief Description Annual National National Conference held in Houston, TX. This is one of the largest venues to recruit African-American MBA Candidates. The COB participated in the recruitment of graduate students College 101 Seminar Participated in high school recruitment program to inform graduating seniors on the realities of campus life. Prairie View A&M University This event is designed to increase awareness of opportunities in specific major and minor areas as well as provide critical information about employment PVAMU Transfer Student Day University-sponsored event designed to promote campus departments and answer questions for new and potential transfer students to the University. Noel Levitz Recruitment Community College Counselors Forum The University Office of Admissions sponsored an informational session for local Community College Counselors. The College of Business made a presentation on programs, services and features of the department to over 75 counselors from various areas. Contacts were made to solidify relationships that would po ssibly develop 2+2 program options to transfer students. 02/05 Pantherland Day Sponsored by the Office of Recruitment, Pantherland Day is Thurgood Marshall HBCU Conference Prairie View A&M University, in collaboration with the Thurgood Marshall Scholarship Fund, sponsored the 6th Annual Presidents & Member Schools' Professional in Houston, TX. The College of Business participated in the Annual HBCU College Night, which produced over 350 interested students and parents. Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 104 of 150 Prairie View A&M University 04/05 Houston Hispanic Forum This was the 19th annual Career and Education Day for students in grades 6-12 in Harris County and 72 adjacent school districts. Parents are invited to attend and learn important information about helping their children prepare for a successful future. A representative from the COB participated as one of the panelists to discuss programs of study and various financial programs available for students Business for Academic and Scholastically Inclined College Program Business for Academically and Scholastically Inclined Students (BASIS), a two-week summer program, is designed to introduce academically talented high school students to the business career options and to the majors that lead to those options. Students are challenged to solve problems using some of the basic principles taught in the program while living on 09/04 - On-Going Recruitment Representatives from the College of Business regularly attend recruitment events at both the undergraduate and graduate level throughout the year. A sample of the 2004-05 academic S.1.c. The policies for admission to business deg ree programs at the undergraduate level should be Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 105 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Conditional Admission to Prairie View A&M University can be attained by a student with an SAT score of 710-810 or an ACT score of 15-16, by supplying an official high school transcript, passage of any state mandated examination used as a high school exit examination, and a high school grade point average of a 2.50 on a 4.00 sc ale. Provisionally admitted students have one calendar year to successfully remedy academic de ficiencies and to demonstrate the ability to be successful in college. A student is granted regul Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 106 of 150 Prairie View A&M University raising have resulted in two $50,000 endowments for scholarships. In the near future, a substantial increase in scholarship endowments is expected from private and corporate sources partly as a result of the success of the Univ ersity’s ongoing $30 million capital campaign. Fund- raising efforts for business scholarships in r ecent years have yielded approximately $30,000 annually. The COB plans to launch an annual campaign to increase the available scholarship Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 107 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Business Student Organization Activities (2004-2005) Organization Activity/Event Date Business Information Students Association Held fund-raisers to support organizational activities. Attended the fifth annual Women in Information Technology (WIT) conference at Texas A&M University. Wednesdays (October 2004) February 16, 2005 Delta Mu Delta Inducted thirteen business students into the Finance/Investment Club Attended the second annual Texas Investment Portfolio Symposium (TIPS) in Houston, February 26, 2005 National Association of Black Accountants Sponsored information session: IRS Sponsored information session on becoming a CPA. Attended annual NABA student conference in Dallas, Texas. Participated for the third consecutive year as trained volunteers in the IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program to help individuals and families with special credits prepare their taxes. September 8, 2004 October 6, 2004 October 21-22, 2004 January 17 - April 13, 2005 Toastmasters Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 108 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Effective Advising - The College has devised and put into u se a systematic advisement plan to improve the advising process and promote student rete ntion. Each student is assigned a specific Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 109 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Monthly The Student Advisory A council composed of the president and one selected representative from each of the College of Business clubs. Monthly Discussions with the Monthly discussion with the dean and several faculty and staff were held regularly to discuss ways to improve the Quarterly Dean’s Lecture Series This series features business leaders, authors, lecturers and the College throughout the year. This series helps further the College of Business mission to provide the highest quality management education by exposing students and faculty to policy makers and industry leaders. Program The Executive-in-Residence program invites senior-level executives, scholars, and other professionals to address a COB Career Fair & Forum This event is designed to in crease internship and post- graduation employment opportunities to students. Nearly twenty organizations come to campus to speak to students about opportunities with their respective businesses. Students also have the opportunity to hear from seasoned professionals on business topics during the adjoining career forum sessions. 12/04, Receptions are held for COB graduates each semester in order to congratulate students on their achievements and to cultivate involved, engaged alumni. Graduates freely discuss their COB experience with the dean and department heads and give their input. Exchange Program Representatives from the National Urban League’s Black Executive Exchange Program visit COB classrooms to advice and give tips on written and oral communication skills, and responsibilities as working professionals. Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 110 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Student Organization Student organizations provide opportunities for students to develop skills needed in business, such as teamwork, planning, organizing, leadership and communication. Several organizations are open to business majors and supported in the College of Business. These student groups are instrumental in the recruitment and retention process for new students through their positive influences and activities. Support for each organization’s agenda is provided through the dean’s office. Opportunities College of Business Scholarships are awarded each academic year to qualified students. To date, the College has two scholarship endowments and will be the benefactor of two additional scholarship endowments, which will eventually generate more than $100K annually. The dean’s Student Orientation/ students for a smooth transition from high school/junior and special events are an opportunity for freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors to familiarize themselves with College of Business faculty, staff, academic procedures, yearly focus for applying for job opportunities, resume writing strategies, interview skills, and other services of the College. Other special events including COB Awards Ceremony for scholarship recipients and graduating Table S.1.c-3 shows results of a recent EBI survey of graduating seniors on their academic experience as well as career services and placement. Although there is certainly room for improvement, the students are generally satisfied with the services provided. 88% of the students found the COB Career Fair to be “fair or good” to “excellent to exceptional.” 76% of th e respondents rated the services provided by the Dean’s staff to be “good to very good” to “excellent to exceptional.” Although there is scope for improvement, the results reveal that students are generally satisfi ed by their experience regarding placement and related Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 111 of 150 Prairie View A&M University EBI/AACSB Survey of Graduating Seniors – Spring 2004: Scores On Selected Institution-Speci fic Questions - Recruitment/Placement Very Poor Very Good A&M University recruitment 22% 24% 39% 14% In my opinion, the performance of the supporting staff in the 4% 21% 49% 27% In my opinion, the performance of the supporting staff of the departmental office is: 6% 2% 59% 33% Moderately Prairie View A&M University 21% 14% 27% 20% 18% I would recommend to friends a business degree from the College of Business at Prairie View A&M University? 12% 10% 22% 36% 19% Dissatisfied accurately measured your knowledge of business? 24% 40% 37% Very Poor How would you rate the usefulness of the University’s Career Fair? 12% 46% 41% How would you rate the Business’ Career Fair? 13% 48% 40% Notes: 2004 EBI/AACSB Undergraduate Business Exit Survey Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 112 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The University College (UC) at PVAMU is a nationally recognized program that has been profiled and funded by grant agencies. The UC has significantly improved freshman student Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 113 of 150 Prairie View A&M University GPA of 3.00 or more on a 4.00 scale, the student may a Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 114 of 150 Prairie View A&M University for coordinating all placement activities in the CO B. The following sections describe some of the University and COB programs and activities to support placement of business gradua tes. To substantially upgrade graduate student placement, a new professional staff dedicated to the placement of graduate students will be hired next year. As part of our assessment processes, the EBI survey of student satisfaction has been used in recent years. Table S. 2.a-1 presents selected results from the recent survey on satisfaction with career and placement services. Students seem to be generally happy with these Table S.2.a-1 2004 EBI/AACSB Survey of Graduating Seniors: Average Scores of Selected Factors & Questions on Career Services PVAMU Rank Career Services - Satisfaction with: Assistance in preparation for permanent job Career Services - Satisfaction with: Access to school’s alumni to cultivate career opportunities Career Services - Satisfaction with: Number of companies recruiting on campus Career Services - Satisfaction with: Quality of companies recruiting on campus Note: Maximum possible score is 5.0; in spring 2004, the select six included Bethune-Cookman College, Ferris State University, Truman State Univ ersity, Indiana University Northwest, Southwest Missouri State University, and Sonoma State University Table S.2.a-2 registration and Advising (2002-2005) Percentage of Responses Term Satisfactory Satisfactory Highly Number of Spring 2002 1 17 82 100 90 Spring 2003 3 18 79 100 132 Summer/Fall 2003 1 30 69 100 70 Spring 2005 1 7 92 100 71 Summer/Fall 2005 11 23 66 100 35 Total 3 18 79 100 398 **Totals may not add to 100 due to rounding. Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 115 of 150 Prairie View A&M University registration and Advising (2002-2005) Table S.2.a-2 and the Exhibit S.2.a-2 show student satisfaction with the academic advising process. These results are based on anonymous student responses a nd are shared with the entire College faculty for improvement. Overall the results indicate a high degree of satisfaction with the College academic Placement Statistics and Events Spring 2002 Spring 2003 Summer/Fall 2003 2005 Summer/Fall 2005 Academic Term(s) Advised Percentage of Respondent Highly Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 116 of 150 Prairie View A&M University suitable and relevant professional development opportun ities. Through the dean’s office, students are able to discuss their career options and concerns. This office also serves as a clearinghouse for information from hiring organizations and the University career services office. Table S.2.a-3 Self-Reported Beginning Salaries of PVAMU Business Students PVAMU College of Business Job Placement Information May-03 Dec-03 May-04 Aug-04 Dec-04 May-05 Average Reported Salary $36,212 $ 38,266 $ 39,243 $ 35,500 $ 40,063 $ 40,650 Number of Students Reporting 36 20 52 18 42 77 Attending Graduate School 0 2 6 1 7 11 Employed at Graduation/ Attending Graduate School Upon Grad. 20 6 23 9 17 43 Highest Salary $60,000 $ 46,500 $ 55,000 $ 41,000 $ 48,000 $ 100,000 Lowest Salary $29,500 $ 32,000 $ 29,000 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ 23,900 Median Salary $34,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,500 $ 42,000 $ 40,000 Percent Employed 56% 30% 44% 44% 40% 56% Percent Attending Grad School 0% 10% 12% 6% 17% 14% Percent Unemployed at Graduation 39% 68% 44% 50% 43% 30% Percent Students Reporting 71% 38% 69% 86% 82% 88% Percent Accounting Majors Employed 50% 33% 67% 100% 71% 60% Percent Finance Majors Employed 67% N/R 80% 100% 20% 38% Percent ADSY Majors Employed 64% 17% 54% 63% 55% 43% Percent Management Employed 50% 25% 67% 50% 45% 55% Note: Information for August 2003 was not available The College’s flagship event is the annual College of Business Career Fair and Forum held during late January. During the career fair, dozens of companie s from across the United States visit the College to talk with students about internship and permanent j ob placement opportunities. Employers are also able Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 117 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table S.2.a-4 Event Company/Organization Date Placement Information Session Internal Revenue Service September 8, 2004 Placement Information Session Boeing September 21, 2004 PVAMU Career Fair Various (75 organizations) September 22, 2004 Placement Information Session Maytag September 22, 2004 Placement Information Session Foley’s September 30, 2004 Career Information Session Goodman Financial Services October 6, 2004 College of Business Career Fair Vari ous (15 organizations) January 26, 2005 Resume Help Clinic College of Business January 26, 2005 Career Building Workshop: The Importance of Having an Internship PVAMU Career Services January 26, 2005 Career Building Workshop: Beyond Salary - Evaluating a Job Offer Sherwin Williams January 26, 2005 Career Building Workshop: Enterprise Rent-A-Car January 26, 2005 PVAMU Career Fair Various (75 organizations) February 9, 2005 Internship Information Session Boeing February 9, 2005 Internship Information Session Foley’s February 10, 2005 Mock Interview Sessions Various (4 organizations) April 8, 2005 Internship Information Session State Farm Insurance April 28, 2005 Career Services The University Career Planning and Outreach Center assists students with career planning and obtaining professional employment. The Center’s staff builds rela tionships with recruiters and provides a means for students to interview. The Career Center also provides assistance for students seeking information on graduate and professional schools. To enhance a student’s placement opportunities for full-time employment after graduation, coopera tive education (co-op) and Internsh ip Programs are made available through the Center. Various career planning, employment, and recruitment materials are available in the Center’s Career Resource Library (Evans Hall, Suite 210). University Career Fair Now in its 34th year, the Career Planning and Outr Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 118 of 150 Prairie View A&M University business. Dozens of companies from across the United States visit the College to speak with students about placement and internship opportunities, as well as assist students with making career decisions through workshops about negotiating salary offers , acing interviews and planning careers. About 300 business students attend each year. The 2005 College of Business Career Fair can be directly credited for generating a larger number of job o ffers made to Prairie View A&M Un iversity Business students. The event generates roughly $3,000 in revenues for the COB. College of Business Internships The COB administration is strongly committed to increasing the number of business students who seek internship experience. The College provides undergradua te course credits for in ternships in accounting, Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 119 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The College has improved its placement efforts in recen t years. This has resulted in greater opportunities for our graduates to find jobs, internships and coop with well-known companies. A list of employers of recent graduates is included in Table S.2.a-5. The list shows a growing number of companies including many Fortune 500 companies are interested in th e College of Business graduates as interns and employees. Table S.2.a-5 Employers (Jobs, Internships) of Recent Business Graduates (2004-2005) Employers Jobs Internship Co-Op Accenture X Allstate Insurance X American Campus Communities X Amegy Bank (formerly Southwest Bank) X Aramark X AT&T X Bank of America X X Bank One (Chase Bank) X Boeing Corporation X X X ConocoPhillips X X Deloitte & Touche X X X Donald Sowells Interest X Duke Energy X X Enterprise Rent-A-Car X X X Equiva X Federal Depository Insurance Corporation X X Federal Reserve Bank X General Electric X General Motors X HEB Foods X X Hewitt Associates X Household Auto Finance X X Houston Independent School District X IBM X Igloo X Internal Revenue Service X X JC Penney X JP Morgan Chase Bank X KB Homes X Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 120 of 150 Prairie View A&M University KPMG X Lawrence Marshall Dealerships X Legacy Financial Group X Marathon Oil X May Department Stores - Foley's X X Maytag X Motorola X NASA X X X Northwestern Mutual X Pfizer Pharmaceuticals X Prairie View A&M University X X PricewaterhouseCoopers X X X Primerica X Ryland Homes X Shell X X Sherwin-Williams X X X Sodexho X Sprint X State Farm Insurance X X State of Texas X X Texas A&M University X X Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts X The Barrington School X The Rucker Group Mortgage X Union Pacific Railroad X University of Houston X University of Texas – Health Science Center X US Coast Guard X X US Department of Agriculture X X Walgreen's X X Wal-Mart X Source: College of Business Placement Services; student survey and informal data collection. Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 121 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The College had conducted a strength and weakness an alysis as part of the Accreditation Plan submitted to the AACSB Candidacy Committee in fall 2002. A be fore and after comparison for issues related to student development, over the three year period, is presented below. Original Weaknesses in Candidacy Plan (Summer 2002) Current Status (Summer 2005) Student body not sufficiently diverse Seve ral steps have been implemented at the University and College level to attract more campus; full-time recruitment staff hired by the more diverse student body, and to attract high-achieving students The number of scholarships funds available to the new $50,000 endowments; ITW Foundation is committed $250,000 over five years to COB; part of the Whitlow Green endowment ($4.3 million) is Few internships opportunities were The College has appointed a full-time faculty to staff is working to increase the number of internship opportunities for business students The placement record of College graduates needs to improve Beginning salary and placement surveys show placement of COB students has improved; surveys are conducted three times a year to keep track of the numbers; new EBI alumni survey will yield more statistics; two professional staff recruited to help Lack of consistency in the graduate admission process. Committee have developed new policies to standardize the admission process Lack of a clear admission process to the New, higher standards for admission to the COB have been adopted and are being gradually implemented Evidence of Continuous Improvement The College has become increasingly student-centered with a commitment to mold students to become able citizens and leaders. Faculty and staff empower students with skills necessar y to succeed in business and industry. Besides classroom instruction, sever al programs are designed to allow students to find faculty mentors, and take full advantage of campus life. The results of various assessments (EBI, Advising, other) have led the College to implement st Self-Evaluation Report Stude nts College of Business Page 122 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Attractive recruitment materials have been prin ted for undergraduate and graduate recruitment; a large number of students receive regular e-ne Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 123 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 124 of 150 Prairie View A&M University counted more than once, if the research was presente d in multiple forums as it evolved from an early draft to a final journal article. For example, if a paper was first presented in an in-house seminar and then turned into a more complete working paper, a c onference proceeding, and was finally published as a journal article, it would be counted more than once assuming that the research evolved significantly over its life. Co-authored papers were counted for each author who is on the College faculty. However, the last column in Table IC-1 presents a “unique count ,” in which the number of co-authored intellectual contributions are counted only once in the portfol io. The College’s performance evaluation policies encourage collaborative research, and indeed this has been a source of strength in our research success. For summer grants and other recognition such as the Dean’s Excellence Award, co-authors have often shared award money and recognition. 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Refereed Conference Proceedings Conference Presentation Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 125 of 150 Prairie View A&M University 2000-012001-022002-032003-042004-05 Journal Articles Proceedings Presentations Other IC Total IC The sustained increase in faculty research productivity in recent years was achieved partly through the recruitment of new faculty members. Since fall 2001, the full time faculty has roughly doubled with most of the new faculty recruited on tenure-track appointment s. A few senior faculty members at the professor and associate professor rank were hired with tenure on arrival. The search committees have followed a consistent strategy of identifying candidates who are either already academically qualified, or show a high Other 28% Journal 26% Proceedings Presentations 29% Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 126 of 150 Prairie View A&M University potential for attaining this status in a short time fr ACCOUNTING Chong, G. 2 1 1 4 Desselle, B. 0 Dobiyanski, A. 0 Feucht, F. 1 1 Lee, B. 1 1 3 1 6 Reed, R. 1 1 2 Discipline Total 2 1 3 5 2 13 Bell, R. 2 1 3 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 127 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table IC-2 (cont’d) Langley, S. 1 1 2 Quazi, R. 1 1 2 1 4 9 Quddus, M. 4 2 1 7 Sharma, S. 0 Soliman, M. 1 1 Wallace, F. 1 2 3 Discipline Total 6 3 2 5 6 22 Handforth. F. 1 1 Jasper, J. 1 1 Khan, M. 1 1 2 Yang, J. 4 1 7 7 8 27 Discipline Total 4 1 7 9 10 31 MANAGEMENT Bailey, H. 0 Debnath, S. 3 3 Dyck, J. 1 1 Geismar, N. 1 4 5 Gupta, O. 1 5 2 11 19 Liang, L. 0 Nelson, G. 0 Sutanto, P. 1 1 White, L. 0 Discipline Total 0 2 5 4 18 29 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS Chen, W. 1 1 Hinson, S. 0 Holloway, R. 0 Mahfouz, A. 4 4 Opara, E. 1 1 3 2 4 11 Tomiuk, D. 1 1 Discipline Total 1 2 3 3 8 17 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 128 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table IC-2 (cont’d) BUSINESS LAW Hill, J. 3 3 6 Joonas, K. 1 1 Tandon, S. 2 2 Discipline Total 0 3 0 4 2 9 Note: This and other tables exclude the publications of faculty who have left period; similarly, the tables include the relevant publications of the new faculty members who have joined the College during this period. IC.1. INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS IC.1: Faculty members should make intellectual cont ributions on a continuing basis appropriate to the school’s mission. The outputs from intellectual contributions should be available for Following the mission, the business faculty is comm itted to intellectual contributions on a continuous basis. While some of these contributions are basi c scholarship, a good number of publications are applied research, and related to instructi onal development. The College exp ects intellectual contributions from each full-time faculty member. Merit raise, promo tion, tenure, and post-tenure evaluation processes reinforce this expectation. The College administration has supported strategies to increase research with a myriad of favorable policies. These include reduc ed teaching load, summer re search grants, increased funding for professional travel, covering submissi on journal fees, incentives for mentoring and collaboration, and recognition. Given our emphasis on undergraduate teaching, a wei ght of 30 percent is assigned to intellectual contributions in faculty evaluations. The College de partment heads, using a modified version of the University’s Annual Performance Development Inst rument, assign 30 percent weight to success in scholarship for annual merit raises. These expectat ions are reinforced during the peer evaluation for tenure-track faculty conducted by the Faculty Comp osition and Development Committee, the Department Over the past five years (2000-2005), the College’s faculty has increased from less than 20 to 37. Table IC.1-5 AND IC.1-3 show the average number of total intellectual contributions over this five-year period is 13.6 per faculty member and 20.0 per graduate faculty member, while the average number of PRJ articles published is 3.6 per faculty member and 5.6 pe r graduate faculty member. Furthermore, over this period 38 percent of all faculty members published three or more PRJ articles, 95 percent of the faculty have published at least one PRJ article, and 73 percent of the faulty had five or more IC activities as broadly defined by AACSB standards. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 129 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The mission statements of Prairie View A&M Univers ity and the College of Business both explicitly state the entities commitment to the pursuit of “excellence in teaching, resear ch and service.” Since PVAMU is primarily a teaching institution, the principal mission is to educate students. However, the College fully recognizes that intellectual contributions enhance a nd update the faculty’s knowledge base, which they 9 14 14 20 19 % of Total 15 20 17 17 11 41 42 59 71 113 % of Total 66 61 70 59 67 12 13 11 30 36 Instructional Development % of Total 19 19 13 25 21 62 69 84 121 168 504 Intellectual Contributions Portfolio by Scholarship Type (2000/1 - 2004/5) Basic 15% Applied Instructional 20% Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 130 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Int. Contributions by Faculty, Discipline and Scholarship Type (2000/1 – 2004/5) Instructional Development Chong, G. 5 16 1 22 Desselle, B. 2 1 3 Dobiyanski, A. 0 Feucht, F. 3 3 Lee, B. 1 24 3 28 Reed, R. 13 4 17 Discipline Total 6 58 9 73 Bell, R. 2 9 11 Langley, S. 5 5 Quazi, R. 2 19 13 34 Quddus, M. 1 14 21 36 Sharma, S. 1 1 Soliman, M. 7 7 Wallace, F. 4 11 1 16 Discipline Total 7 57 35 99 Handforth. F. 1 4 5 Jasper, J. 1 6 7 Khan, M. 10 10 Yang, J. 10 46 1 57 Discipline Total 11 61 7 79 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 131 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Int. Contributions by Faculty, Discipline and Scholarship Type (2000/1 – 2004/5) Instructional Development Bailey, H. 4 1 5 Debnath, S. 2 13 15 Dyck, J. 1 1 Geismar, N. 22 22 15 29 6 50 1 1 1 1 Sutanto, P. 7 5 1 13 3 3 Discipline Total 44 44 23 111 1 4 2 7 5 5 Holloway, R. 0 Mahfouz, A. 3 17 1 21 1 27 2 30 Tomiuk, D. 4 1 5 Discipline Total 5 57 6 68 BUS LAW 1 11 3 15 2 9 5 16 Tandon, S. 3 5 8 Discipline Total 3 23 13 39 College Total 76 326 102 504 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 132 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Minimum Standards in Intellectual Contributions While excellence in terms of intellectual contributi on is desirable, an academically qualified faculty member is expected to provide evidence of satisf actory level of productivity (regarding intellectual contribution) during the period of evaluation under consideration. Professionally qualified faculty may have a higher teaching load compared to academic ally qualified faculty, and consequentially, a lower requirement for intellectual contribution As outlined by AACSB International, a broad spectrum of activities is included in the area of intellectual contribution. While a faculty member’s contribu tion in any of these areas will be taken into consideration, the minimum require ments for satisfactory performance in this area for tenure and/or promotion to the next rank shall include the following: Three refereed journal publications Four publications in well-recognized refereed journals Faculty in the College of Business may be classified as either academically or professionally qualified, or other. To be academically or professionally qualifie d, a faculty member must have a combination of academic preparation augmented by current professi onal development activities in the area of teaching assignment. Based on internal discussions, consultati ons with members of the mock visit team, deans of following definitions have been adopted. Academically Qualified (AQ) Faculty : The faculty member must have a terminal degree in the area of teaching assignment, or in a related area, as ou Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 133 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The College has in place an innova tive and generous support mechanism involvement in quality research has become a norm. The system works through a combination of incentives, rewards and recognitions discussed below. Dean’s Excellence in Research Award One faculty member is selected each year for this award based on the number of refereed journal articles published or accepted for publication. The selection criterion would eventually be expanded beyond journal articles to include the entire spectrum of in tellectual contributions as defined by AACSB (books, Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 134 of 150 Prairie View A&M University annually allotted to each faculty member. However, if a faculty member is pres enting a paper, the dean’s office will provide additional funds. In 2002, the PVAMU formally joined a platform of eight Centers for International Business and Education Research. Under this initiative, since 2003, at least ten COB faculty members have received training on teaching and resear ch on international business topics in various CIBER workshops across the country. Student Assistants A limited number of undergraduate and graduate studen t workers are available to assist faculty members Faculty Research Seminar Series Each semester the Intellectual Contributions Committ ee organizes a faculty research seminar series. The seminar series have helped create a vibrant atmosphe re for collaborative research across disciplines. The seminars provide faculty members with an inform Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 135 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Individual Faculty Cumulative IC Portfolio (2000/1 – 2004/5) & Faculty J P N O J P NOJ P N OJ P NOJP N O J P N 2 2 2 Desselle 1 11 Dobiyanski 1 1 1 1 1 13 *Feucht 0 0 2 2 1 1 112 2 1 2 5 4 213 2 2 2 2 4 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 11 1 4 2 2 59 Scholarship Type: B = Basic Scholarship; A = App lied Scholarship; I = Instructional Development. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 136 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years Discipline & Faculty J P N O J P NOJ P N OJ P NOJ P N O J P N O T *Langley 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 12 2 2 5 5 3 5 6 19 1 1 1 2 11 6 2 1 2 8 13 0 1 1 1 Sharma 0 Soliman 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 4 2 1 4 4 11 *Wallace 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 0 Jasper Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 137 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years & Faculty J P N O J P NOJPN OJ P NOJ P N O J P N OT 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 10 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 1 11 3 2 1 1 2 6113 6 3 1 9 2 3 8 25 3 22 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 7 4 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 7115 2 9 0 6 3 2 5 8 31 3 29 Bailey 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 4 4 3 13 *Dyck 1 11 2 1 1 2 3 4 1 5 5 2 5 0 *Geismar 0 0 0 1 1 1 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 138 of 150 Prairie View A&M University 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 Last 5 Years Faculty Name J P N O J P N O J P N O J P N O J P N O J P N O T 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 12 12 13 14 10 12 18 12 29 21 28 33 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 *Mahfouz 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 2 1 4 4 3 1 11 4 8 4 27 *Opara 2 2 2 Tomiuk 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 2 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 2 3 2 4 5 8 2 5 4 16 11 17 13 57 1 3 1 1 2 4 6 1 4 4 2 2 0 2 8 3 3 2 4 3 5 5 0 8 3 5 4 17 15 18 18 68 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 139 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years e & Faculty J P N O J P N OJ P N OJ P N OJ P N O J P N O T 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 3 1 3 2 2 3 7 2 4 2 5 3 5 4 7 4 0 1 1 1 4 6 1 2 8 1 7 9 2 3 1 0 2 3 1 5 2 5 8 3 3 1 7 2 2 4 1 9 5 5 5 9 3 8 3 326 3 3 4 2 1 2 0 0 1 4 6 4 7 5 6 5 7 6 1 5 2 1 1 0 1 5 8 1 6 3 0 2 1 1 2 3 2 1 9 3 2 2 6 4 6 1 7 4 9 2 2 3 1 6 6 1 3 3 8 3 1 4 6 1 4 2 504 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 140 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Individual Faculty Count of All Intellectual Contributions (2000/1 – 2004/5) Faculty Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total IC Chong, G. 5 5 2 4 22 Desselle, B. 2 1 3 Dobiyanski, A. 0 Feucht, F. 2 1 3 Lee, B. 5 3 5 6 28 Reed, R. 8 3 6 17 Discipline Total 18 10 9 14 22 73 BUS. COM Bell, R. 5 6 11 Langley, S. 1 2 5 Quazi, R. 1 1 8 19 34 Quddus, M. 10 2 5 9 36 Sharma, S. 1 Soliman, M. 1 1 1 2 2 7 Wallace, F. 3 2 4 16 Discipline Total 15 12 11 21 40 99 Handforth. F. 1 1 1 5 Jasper, J. 1 1 3 2 7 Khan, M. 1 2 3 4 10 Yang, J. 5 21 11 17 57 Discipline Total 6 5 25 18 25 79 shaded numbers denote the year in which the faculty me mber joined PVAMU as a full-time faculty. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 141 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Individual Faculty Count of All Intellectual Contributions (2000/1 – 2004/5) 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total IC Bailey, H. 5 5 Debnath, S. 1 1 5 8 15 Dyck, J. 1 1 Geismar, N. 1 4 7 22 Gupta, O. 2 7 11 17 50 Liang, L. 1 1 Nelson, G. 1 1 Sutanto, P. 7 3 2 1 13 White, L. Discipline Total 2 17 21 25 46 111 Chen, W. 2 1 Hinson, S. 3 1 1 5 Holloway, R. 0 Mahfouz, A. 4 1 2 3 21 Opara, E. 1 7 7 7 8 30 Tomiuk, D. 1 2 2 5 Discipline Total 11 12 12 13 20 68 BUS. LAW 3 2 24 Hill, J. 1 4 2 Joonas, K. 1 1 13 16 Tandon, S. 1 4 3 8 Discipline Total 2 6 2 22 7 39 shaded numbers denote the year in which the faculty me mber joined PVAMU as a full-time faculty. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 142 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Total and Annual Average Faculty Intellectual Contributions ACCT Chong, G.* 4 0.8 8 1.6 10 2.0 22 4.4 2 0.4 1 0.2 3 0.6 Dobiyanski, A. 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 3 0.6 6 1.2 11 2.2 5 1.0 6 1.2 28 5.6 2 0.4 7 1.4 6 1.2 2 0.4 17 3.4 Discipline Total 13 2.6 18 3.6 22 4.4 20 4.0 73 14.6 BUS. COM 3 0.6 3 0.6 5 1 11 2.2 Langley, S.* 2 0.4 2 0.4 1 0.2 5 1.0 9 1.8 4 0.8 7 1.4 14 2.8 34 6.8 Quddus, M.* 7 1.4 4 0.8 9 1.8 16 3.2 36 7.2 Sharma, S. 1 0.2 1 0.2 Soliman, M. 1 0.2 2 0.4 4 0.8 7 1.4 3 0.6 1 0.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 16 3.2 Discipline Total 22 4.4 11 2.2 28 5.6 38 7.6 99 19.8 Handforth. F.* 1 0.2 4 0.8 5 1.0 1 0.2 2 0.4 4 0.8 7 1.4 2 0.4 1 0.2 4 0.8 3 0.6 10 2.0 27 5.4 2 0.4 19 3.8 9 1.8 57 11.4 Discipline Total 31 6.2 3 0.6 29 5.8 16 3.2 79 15.8 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 143 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Total and Annual Average Faculty Intellectual Contributions MGMT Bailey, H. 1 0.2 2 0.4 2 0.4 5 1.0 Debnath, S.* 3 0.6 5 1.0 4 0.8 3 0.6 15 3.0 Dyck, J.* 1 0.2 1 0.2 Geismar, N.* 5 1.0 2 0.4 5 1.0 10 2.0 22 4.4 19 3.8 7 1.4 12 2.4 12 2.4 50 10.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 Sutanto, P.* 1 0.2 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 13 2.6 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 3 0.6 Discipline Total 29 5.8 21 4.2 28 5.6 33 6.6 111 22.2 1 0.2 3 0.6 2 0.4 1 0.2 7 1.4 3 0.6 2 0.4 5 1.0 Holloway, R. 0 0.0 Mahfouz, A.* 4 0.8 8 1.6 3 0.6 6 1.2 21 4.2 11 2.2 4 0.8 8 1.6 7 1.4 30 6.0 Tomiuk, D. 1 0.2 2 0.4 2 0.4 5 1.0 Discipline Total 17 3.4 15 3.0 18 3.6 18 3.6 68 13.6 BUS. LAW 6 1.2 4 0.8 3 0.6 2 0.4 15 3.0 1 0.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 3 0.6 16 3.2 Tandon, S.* 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.4 8 1.6 Discipline Total 9 1.8 12 2.4 11 2.2 7 1.4 39 7.8 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 144 of 150 Prairie View A&M University List of Peer Reviewed Journals in Whic h Faculty Have Published (2000/1 – 2004/5) JOURNAL NAME FREQUENCY El Trimestre Económico (Mexico) 1 Academy of Accounting & Fi nancial Studies Journal 1 American Business Review 1 American Indian Law Review 2 Annals of Economics and Finance 1 Applied Financial Economics 5 Asia Pacific Management Review 4 Business Journal for Entrepreneurs 1 CIIMA (Communications of the IIMA) Journal 3 Contemporary Economic Policy 1 Cornell Law Review 1 Eastern Economic Review 1 Economic Inquiry 1 European Journal of Operational Research 2 Financial Review 1 Florida State University Law Review 1 Global Business & Economic Review 2 Global Business & Finance Review 1 History of Economic Ideas 1 Human Systems Management 1 IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering 1 Industrial Management and Data Systems 1 Information Systems Journal 1 International Journal of Acc International Journal of Business and Economics 1 International Journal of Digital Management 1 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 145 of 150 Prairie View A&M University List of Peer Reviewed Journals in Whic h Faculty Have Published (2000/1 – 2004/5) JOURNAL NAME FREQUENCY International Journal of Condition Monitoring & Diagnostic Engineering Management International Journal of Informa tion Technology and Decision Making 1 International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management 1 International Journal of Logis tics Systems and Management 1 International Journal of Manageme nt and Enterprise Development 1 International Journal of Mobile Communications 1 International Journal of Service Management 1 International Journal of Technol International Review of Applied Economics 1 Journal of Accounting and Finance Research 1 Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 1 Journal of Bangladesh Studies 3 Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching 1 Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 2 Journal of Developing Areas 1 Journal of Economic Development 1 Journal of Economics and Sociology 1 Journal of Empirical Finance 1 Journal of Financial and Economic Practice 1 Journal of Forensic Accounting 2 Journal of Global Business 1 Journal of Global Information Management 1 Journal of Global Information Technology Management 1 Journal of Information Technology Management 1 Journal of International Financial Journal of International Money and Finance 2 Journal of International Technolog y and Information Management 1 Journal of Labor Economics 1 Journal of Multinational Financial Management 1 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 146 of 150 Prairie View A&M University List of Peer Reviewed Journals in Whic h Faculty Have Published (2000/1 – 2004/5) JOURNAL NAME FREQUENCY Journal of Multi-state Taxation & Incentives 1 Journal of Product & Brand Management 1 Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 1 Journal of Regional Science 1 Journal of Scheduling 2 Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1 Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 1 Managerial Finance Journal 1 North Dakota Law Review 1 Oregon Law Review 1 Regional Business Review 1 SIAM Review 1 Southern Business & Economic Journal 1 Southwestern Business Administration Journal 1 Tax Notes 1 The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 1 The International Journal of Business and Public Administration 1 The International Journal of Men’s Health 1 The Journal of Applied Accounting Research 1 and Applied Management 1 The Journal of Current Research in Global Business 3 The Journal of Human-Centered Systems and Machine Intelligence 1 The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 1 The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 1 Troy State University Business and Economic Review 1 Tulsa Law Review 1 Water Resources Management 1 Total Number of Different Peer Reviewed Journals = 93 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 147 of 150 Prairie View A&M University In the 2002 Accreditation Plan, the College had identifie d several deficiencies in the area of research and intellectual contributions. A before and after analys is shows the considerable progress that has been Teaching load is too high All graduate faculty now have a reduced load of 3+3 Less than 50% of the faculty members have an active research Faculty publication has increased markedly in recent years; Almost all tenure track faculty members have published PRJ articles in recent years; even non tenure track faculty are participating in intellectual efforts. Technology support for faculty and The College and the University has invested heavily in technology infrastructure and services; all business faculty and staff have their own computers and local printers; new staff has been added for technology support; all classrooms are equipped with the state-of-art Lack of adequate clerical and The number of full-time administrative staff has increased from four to six; the Center for Communications can assist faculty improve their drafts; the two assistants to the dean also work with faculty to support teaching and grant writing. Graduate assistants and student workers are now available for faculty Lack of incentives (merit raises) and This has improved dramatically with the merit raises now directly connected to success in publishing articles in peer reviewed journals. In th e last two merit raise cycles, the most productive researchers received substantial adjustments; Dean’s Excellence in Research Award comes with a $1,000 prize. Evidence of Continuous Improvements The annual number of refereed journal articles ha s increased from 16 in 2000 to 49 in 2004-2005. Although the faculty size has increased during this period, this (200% increase) is impressive. The growth has been sustained from year to year and is broad based with most faculty members with an active research agenda. Counting broadly the total annual intellectual cont ributions, over this period has increased from 62 to 168. This demonstrates that active partic ipation in research has now been embraced by the An active research seminar series has attracted ma ny faculty presenters and outside speakers with established research credentials. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 148 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The newly adopted strategic plan makes specifi c reference to the quality of publications. The central administration continues to make av ailable resources to support reduced teaching loads and other incentives for success in intellectual contributions. Future Plans The statistics presented in this section demonstrate the considerable success in the area of intellectual contributions achieved by the business faculty at Prair ie View A&M University. The College is confident the faculty research activities will be sustained and the portfolio will increasingly reflect the pursuit for informing faculty teaching through outstanding scholarship. Focus more attention to producing research in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Self-Evaluation Report Transiti on Plan College of Business Page 149 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Transiti on Plan College of Business Page 150 of 150 Prairie View A&M University embedded assessment. A new Assessment Coordinato r for the College has b een appointed. These and other related initiatives have helped the College to monitor student learning and seek to make improvements in admission, curriculum and other areas. In the next couple of years, the College expects to do more to fully embrace this standard. In spri ng 2005, a College of Business Assessment Coordinator was appointed to improve the management of our assu rance of learning efforts for successfully closing Dr. Douglas Eder has been invited to present two work shops on the assurance of learning for the College of Business faculty in September 2005. All faculty members are expected to take advantage of this training opportunity. These workshops will help train and energize the faculty regarding assessment. These workshops will also help the Co llege evaluate the current assessme nt and find ways to optimize the utilization of resources to increase effi ciency in this area. In the futu re, the College plans to collaborate with other business schools, and across the PVAMU ca mpus (the University is poised for SACS re- accreditation in 2010) to learn from one another. The Business Advisor in our Initia l Accreditation Peer Review Team has recommended that the College carefully select peer institutions in the three categor ies defined by AACSB, since benchmarking plays an important role in the maintenance of accreditation un der the new standards. The College already has a list of peer comparison institutions that were used for th e EBI/AACSB survey and other purposes. This list is being reviewed using new information from AACSB Intern ational and will be finalized in the near future. AACS Sel -E aluation port PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY COB STRATEGIC PLAN INTELLECTUAL INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES AND CURRICULUM CONTENT AND EVALUATION FACULTY COMPOSITION & 22. Actual AQ FTE faculty w/o doctoral degree 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 1 2.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19. Actual no. of AQ or PQ FTE faculty (Items 17+18) 3.25 4 7.33 2.25 4 5.17 2.5 4.25 5.59 3.25 6 8.58 2 1.5 3.33 20. Actual AQ+PQ/ Min. AQ+PQ Faculty Req. 1.12 1.19 1.87 0.87 1.40 1.68 0.63 1.18 1.57 0.69 1.23 1.51 1.03 0.87 1.59 d (AQ) Faculty without Doctoral Degree 15. Actual AQ FTE/ MFTE AQ Faculty Req. 0.74 0.76 2.24 1.24 1.85 2.50 0.77 1.68 2.11 0.80 1.28 1.54 1.75 1.45 2.79 Academically (AQ) & Professiona lly (PQ) Qualified Faculty 16. Minimum AQ or PQ faculty req. (Item 5X0.9) 2.91 3.37 3.93 2.60 2.86 3.07 3.96 3.59 3.56 4.70 4.87 5.69 1.93 1.73 2.09 17. Actual number of AQ FTE faculty 1.25 1.5 5.33 2 3.25 4.67 1.75 3.5 4.34 2.25 4 5.33 2 1.5 3.33 12. AQ MFTE graduate faculty (Item 4X0.75) 0.21 0.3 0.6 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.2625 0.27 0.24 0.59 0.68 0.88 0.21 0.23 0.10 13. Total AQ MFTE faculty req. (Items 11+12) 1.69 1.97 2.38 1.61 1.76 1.87 2.29 2.09 2.06 2.81 2.93 3.45 1.14 1.04 1.19 14. Actual number of AQ FTE faculty 1.25 1.5 5.33 2 3.25 4.67 1.75 3.5 4.34 2.25 3.75 5.33 2 1.5 3.33 9. Actual no. of full-time faculty 4 5 7 4 4 5 5 5 7 5 7 9 2 2 3 10. Actual FT/ Minimum FT Faculty Req. 1.65 1.78 2.14 1.85 1.68 1.95 1.52 1.67 2.36 1.28 1.73 1.90 1.24 1.39 1.72 11. AQ MFTE undergrad faculty (Item 3X0.5) 1.48 1.67 1.78 1.11 1.25 1.38 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.22 2.25 2.58 0.93 0.81 1.10 5. Total min. FTE (MFTE) faculty req. (Items 3+4) 3.24 3.75 4.36 2.89 3.18 3.41 4.40 3.99 3.96 5.22 5.41 6.32 2.15 1.92 2.32 6. Actual number of FTE faculty 4.25 6.5 7.58 4 4.25 5.17 5.5 5.25 6.59 6.75 8 9.83 2 2.5 3.58 7. Actual FTE/ Minimum FTE Faculty Req. 1.31 1.74 1.74 1.38 1.34 1.52 1.25 1.32 1.67 1.29 1.48 1.55 0.93 1.30 1.54 Full-Time (FT) & AQ Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty 2. Total graduate semester credit hours (GSCH) 84 120 240 201 201 198 105 108 96 237 270 351 84 90 39 3. Undergraduate minimum FTE (USCH/400) 2.96 3.35 3.56 2.22 2.51 2.75 4.05 3.63 3.64 4.43 4.51 5.15 1.87 1.62 2.19 4. Graduate minimum FTE (GSCH/300) 0.28 0.4 0.8 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.35 0.36 0.32 0.79 0.9 1.17 0.28 0.3 0.13 Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 51 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table FD.4.b7 Faculty Computation by Discipline: Spring Semester 2003-2005 ACTUAL VS. MINIMUM REQD. 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 26 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Future Plans Reorganizing the College administrative structure to include an associate or assistant dean to take care of assessment, grants, recruitment, re tention and placement will increase efficiency. Faculty Handbook and standards for promotion and te nure will be revised to reflect the increased emphasis on the quality of intellectual contributions. The graduate programs will be e xpanded to explore the possibility of an executive MBA or an overseas program to broaden the revenue base. Admission standards to the College will be furt her strengthened to ensu Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 25 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Voluntary Income Tax Assistance (VITA) VITA is the College’s service learning program. Under faculty supervision and with active support of the Internal Revenue Service, accounting students offer w eekly assistance at various sites to individuals and businesses interested in filing their income tax electronica lly. This is the third year of our program, which has been greatly expanded, with special outreach to the Houston Korean community. Prior to being accepted in Candidacy, the College of Business prepared the Accreditation Plan based on a strength and weakness analysis. The text below pr esents information on how the College has addressed the weaknesses in the area of mission development since that time. Weaknesses Identified in the Accreditation Plan (Summer 2002) Current Status (Summer 2005) The mission was not adequately employed in guiding policies in the areas of faculty development, curriculum, instructional resources and responsibilities, and intellectual contributions. ll 2002 and first major revision in spring 2005, the College administration and faculty are acutely aware of the mission; this has resulted in the mission being used as a guiding document in the life of the College in the decision-making process. The mission was not adequately displayed to raise awareness. The mission is displayed in the building display Evidence of Continuous Improvement The vision and mission statements, after their initia l formulation in fall 2002, were revised. The process of revision was refreshing as a large nu mber of faculty and other constituents were voluntary participants and genuinely contributed to the dialogue. The mission statement formed th e basis for the strategic plan (2005-2009) approved by the faculty in May 2005. Many of the mission elem ents are reflected in the goals, objectives, and strategies of the College. The mission forms the basis of the core values and relative emphasis on teaching, intellectual contributions, and service. These weights are used to evaluate faculty performance and allocate The Center for International Business Educati on, the Small Business Development Center, and initiatives in personal finance and entrepreneurship are all dictated by the mission that guides the College to be relevant to the local communities Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 24 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Additional committees and taskforces are used to perform other tasks with in the COB. The role of each of these groups is described in the COB Faculty Handbook or their charge and is briefly given below. This group consists of graduate faculty and recommends policies and procedures to the dean and graduate faculty for improvement of the MBA and MSA progra ms. The Committee assists the director of graduate programs with admission and curriculum issues in th e graduate business programs. The director also The Committee monitors the COB technology infrastructur e and ensures that it is at par with accreditation standards. Composed mostly of MIS faculty, this group is responsible for the technology plan in the College and for recommending policies to the dean. The group works closely with the computer service specialist in the COB to ensure that the technology hardware, software, and serv ices available to business students and faculty are superior. Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 23 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Student Development Alfreda Dobiyanski—Chair Sonja Langley—Co-chair G. Nelson R. Reed J. Jasper Review scholarship applications Review student grade appeals and disciplinary appeals Advise on internship and related policies Deal with relevant policy issues that may arise during the course of the semester Curriculum Content and Evaluation Larry White—Chair M. Soliman F. Handforth Mahfouz Instructional Resources and Responsibilities Reginald Bell—Chair Intellectual Contributions Rahim Quazi—Chair J. Yang N. Geismar Organize the research seminar series Consider new policies or revisions of existing policies pertaining to improving the research environment to reach AACSB International goals Periodically collect and analyze the data of faculty intellectual contributions, Mission and Strategic Planning Munir Quddus—Chair J. Dyck—Co-chair M. Khan S. Debnath M. Soliman S. Tandon K. Gordon Review the mission (as committed in the Accreditation Plan) and make sure it is widely disseminated and is used in policy making Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 22 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Faculty Composition and Development Committee This group is responsible for maintaining AACSB sta ndards with respect to faculty sufficiency. The Committee also acts as the peer-review committee for pr omotion and tenure decisions and is composed of tenured faculty members. Student Committee This group is responsible for maintaining AACSB st andards with respect to students. The Committee assists with review of assessment (EBI Survey of St udent Satisfaction) and acts as the scholarship and Curriculum Content and Evaluation Committee This committee is responsible for ensuring that a ll curriculum issues are ha ndled in accordance with AACSB standards. The group reviews all change ng to existing and new courses and programs in the COB. It has faculty re presentation from most functional areas in business. It is also involved in assessment activities, monitoring the results of course-embedded assessment, and the Faculty Composition and Development Jeanne Hill—Chair S. Debnath P. Sutanto Evaluate all tenure-track faculty on schedule Review promotion application Review tenure and post-tenure applications Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 21 of 150 Prairie View A&M University the College’s activities are consistent with its mission Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 20 of 150 Prairie View A&M University In fall 2004, for the undergraduate students enrolled in the COB, the average SAT scores were 944 (470 in Verbal and 474 in Math), and the combined average ACT score was 19. The College’s SAT scores were somewhat be tter than the University average (404 and 402 on Verbal and Math, respectively). Recent statistics show an upward trend in these scores as the University and the College strive to reduce the number of provi sional admits and increase admission standards to Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 19 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Program Learning Objectives for the MBA The Master of Science in Accounting curriculu m is designed to provide advanced accounting preparation for careers in public, private, and governmental accounting. The aim of the program is to produce graduates who are capable of solv ing problems relating to the accounting field in a The COB considers students for admission in the u ndergraduate and graduate programs once they have Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 18 of 150 Prairie View A&M University management major is based on the belief that the development of competent managers for based on a liberal arts foundation that emphasizes the understanding of the economic, soci al, and political forces in a multicultural global environment. The major emphasis of the management curriculum is on problem The Master of Business Administration progr am is designed for graduate students who demonstrate potential for acquiring advanced knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in a Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 17 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Learning Objectives for the BBA knowledge from various disciplines (including Each undergraduate major in business builds on the ge neral education and the COB core to achieve additional goals and objectives: major seeks to offer a quality, comprehe nsive accounting education that prepares students for immediate employment in the privat e and public sectors, as well as for graduate or professional education. Students, the program’s mo st valued stakeholders, are provided with a curriculum that offers a quality business educat ion with a solid liberal arts foundation to encourage logical, analytical, and creative thinki ng. Accounting majors attend lectures and have opportunities to participate in activities designed to develop them into c onfident, global-minded Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 16 of 150 Prairie View A&M University M.3 EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES M.3. The school must specify th e educational objectives of each degree program offered and identify the characteristics of students and oth er constituents served by each of those degree In pursuit of its efforts to offer high-quality educa tional programs consistent with accreditation standards, the COB offers a 123-semester-credit-hour Bachelor of Business Administration degree, a 36-semester- credit-hour Master of Business Administration degree, and a 30-semester-credit-hour Master of Science in Accounting degree. The BBA program allows st udents to pick one of five majors—accounting, Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 15 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table M.2-2 Dean’s Advisory Board (Spring 2005) Name Position/Organization Address Phone/E-mail Robert Bernal Houston, TX 77040 robert.a.bernal@jci.com Assistant Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of 1801 Allen Parkway Houston, TX 77019 Donald.Bowers@dal.frb.org Felix Braggs ConocoPhillips Company 600 North Dairy Ashford Houston, TX 77079-1175 felix.e.braggs@conocophillips.com Rodney Brisco President and CEO Elegant Epicurean Catering, Houston, TX 77094 info@elegantepicur eancatering.com Glen Hegar Texas, District 28 P.O. Box 1008 Katy, TX 77492 Jamie G. House Executive VP & CFO Smith Graham & Comp. 6900 Chase Tower Managing Director P.O. Box 760218 Lathrup Village, MI City of Waller Economic Dev. Corporation Mayor Prairie View, Texas P.O. Box 188 Vernell Jackson Vice President & General Manager Boeing P.O. Box 7730 MC K79-60 Wichita, KS 67277-7730 Vernell.jackson@boeing.com Solomon Musyimi Attorney-at-Law The Law Firm of Solomon Musyimi Ray Nelson Contracting Tech. Leader 12031 Strang Road La Porte, TX 77572 Ray.C.Nelson-1@usa.dupont.com Waller County, Texas Bobby E. Scott Internal Revenue Service 1919 Smith St. M/S Houston, TX 77002 bobby.e.scott@irs.gov President Magnolia Chamber of Commerce Magnolia, TX 77353 Georgia A. Thomas Internal Revenue Service Houston, TX 77074-9919 Georgia.A.Thomas@irs.gov Fred Washington Associate Vice President, Finance and Administration Prairie View A&M University 936-857-2952, 2953 President Waller Area Chamber of Commerce Waller, TX 77484 vince@wallerchamber.com Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 14 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table M.2-1 (cont’d) Empower Students to Achieve Their Dreams Respond to the Needs and Aspirations of Individuals, Black Executive Exchange Program Curricular changes—personal finance and IB minors Building relations with corporations $2,000 $1,000 $1,000 Aspiring to Graduate Programs Committed to Advance Education. New MSA program Recruited full-time director of graduate programs and staff New fee for MBA placement office Increased recruitment efforts (membership with the National Black and Hispanic MBA Associations) $300,000 $95,000 $500 High-Quality Conducting national searches for qualified Recruited 15 new faculty over the last three Source: College of Business documents; the financial figures are approximate. The College has worked hard to bu ild partnerships with a broad range of external constituents including business and industry. These relationships are cultivat ed for resources, ideas, and input for continuous improvement: Dean’s Advisory Board —For the past three years, the COB has received strong support from an active Board. Consistent with the College’s mi ssion, the dean has cultivated relationships with senior managers in business and industry inter ested in supporting the College to develop Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 13 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table M.2-1 COB and University Missions and Suppo rtive College Activities (2002-2005) COB University COB Activities in Support of the Mission Recurring Excellence in Excellence in Investment in multimedia technology Recruited qualified faculty members (2002- 2005) Dean’s Excellence in Teaching Award Faculty brown bag seminars Student evaluations Assessment of learning (Educational Benchmarking, Inc., [EBI] survey and Excellence in Excellence in Dean’s Excellence in Research Award Reduced teaching load Summer research grants Research training Software Travel support $1,000 $350,000 $25,000 $5,000 $20,000 $30,000 $110,000/2006 Excellence in Excellence in Dean’s Excellence in Service Award Evaluation and merit raise New centers— Small Business Development Center (SBDC) and Center for International Business Education (CIBE) Membership with local chambers of commerce $1,000 $40,000/2005 $40,000 $1,000 High-Quality, Premier Business Institution Institution of the AACSB accreditation candidacy, mock visit, Diverse Student Body Skills— Employable Professionals Preparing Undergraduates for a Range of Established the Center for Business Communications with professional staff Increased emphasis on internships and co-ops Special events (Black Executive Exchange Program [BEEP]) for students to develop Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 12 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Exhibit M.1-1 Mission Statement Review Process Periodic reviews are scheduled every two years Change in COB Dean Change in PVAMU President Change in PVAMU or TAMU mission Dean’s Advisory Board Mission and Strategic Planning Committee and Dean Mission guides strategic planning a The mission is published in the Undergraduate and Graduate Catalogs, in every issue of COB Faculty Handbook M.2 MISSION APPROPRIATENESS M.2: The school’s mission must be appropriate to higher education for business and management and consonant with the mission of the institution of which it is a part. The mission of the College of Business is consonant with that of Prairie View A&M University. Both have a commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and service and to a continuation of the land-grant tradition of the Morrill Act of 1890, while keeping its doors open to all students regardless of race, creed, color, gender, or national origin. Prairie View A&M University is a member of Th e Texas A&M University System (TAMUS) and is accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the S outhern Association of Colleges and Schools for awarding bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees. The mission statements of the University as well as TAMUS accurately reflect their commitments as institu tions of higher education to offering programs of study in various disciplines, in cluding business management. Table M.2-1 presents a crosswalk to demonstrate that the College’s miss ion is consonant with the Univers ity’s mission. Further, the COB expends resources and engages in activities appropriate for an institution of higher learning in business Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 11 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Intellectual Contributions: Engaging in intellectual contributions is our second priority with an assigned weight of 30 percent in the evaluation process. We encourag e research that provides insights into business education, practical aspects of industry, and the theory of business. We actively support interdisciplinary and collabo rative efforts in intellectual contributions because complex issues in business are best understood by drawing from many basic disciplines throughout academe. We support a wide spectrum of intellectual contri butions that are of relevance and add value to the body of knowledge in management prac tice and education. The College encourages faculty to pursue a mix of scholarship in management practices and pedagogical topics. Service is our third priority with an assigned we ight of 20 percent in the evaluation process. All members of the COB community are encouraged to use their expertise to benefit external stakeholders and to create opportunities for stude nts and faculty to apply their knowledge and We seek alliances and partnerships with business and industry leaders to add relevance to our curriculum and educational mission. We encourage community outreach activities to assist the local communities in business and economic development. Development of the Mission Statement The College began developing a mi ssion statement in fall 2001. Faculty members were assigned to committees each aligned to one of the six standard s emphasized in the AACSB International accreditation process. The Mission and Strategic Planning Committ ee (MSPC) led the efforts in developing a new mission statement that would guide the institution in its quest for AACSB International accreditation. The chair of this committee served as a coordinator fo r the accreditation and assessment efforts. Starting Self-Evaluation Report Mission and Objectives College of Business Page 10 of 150 Prairie View A&M University M1. MISSION M.1. The school must have a clear and published mi ssion statement that is subjected to periodic review and revised as needed. The Prairie View A&M University COB has developed clear vision and mission statements to guide its operations. These statements were first develope d in 2001-2002 after extensive dialogue with and participation of important constituents of the COB. The mission statement is in line with the AACSB accreditation standards and aligned with the Prairi e View A&M University mission statement. The Mission and Strategic Planning Committee is responsible for revisiting the mission statement at least once every two years. The most recent revision took place in spring 2005. Developing and revising the statement and publicizing the mission through various medi a ensure its relevancy to the day-to-day life of The vision of the College of Business is to be a premier business institution that empowers students to realize their dreams through an excellent education. The mission of the COB is to provide a diverse st udent body with a business education that produces Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 78 of 150 Prairie View A&M University After a training workshop on course-embedded assessment in fall 2003, faculty approved an Assessment Plan that has been implemented over the Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 77 of 150 Prairie View A&M University area of curriculum. The table below shows how Lack of Standardization of content coverage of multi-section courses Discipline coordinators have been appointed to work with faculty and department heads on assessment and content coverage; in some disciplines, faculty use a common final exam in multi-section courses. All core courses have common learning goals developed by the faculty and used to assess learning. Insufficient coverage of diversity, political, social, regulatory, communication, global, and No established planning process to assure that the curriculum for each major accurately reflects the College’s mission Several majors and the graduate curriculum have been extensively reviewed. Necessary changes have been introduced. The MIS faculty recently implemented an extensive review and modernization of the MIS curriculum to reflect the mission of Lack of integration within the curricula Besides the capstone course, integration of the functional disciplines takes place in several courses in the undergraduate a nd graduate programs. Several faculty use business plans, case studies, Business Week, Evidence of Continuous Improvement In recent years, the undergraduate and graduate curri cula have been considerably strengthened. The College believes that high-quality programs and processes in place to en sure continuous improvement in the curricula. A few highlights are presented below: The admission standards have been strengthened w ith a two-step process that would eventually require all students interested in studying busin ess to first satisfy the minimum requirements, including a GPA of 2.30, before being formally admitted. All courses in the BBA program were thoroughly reviewed in the 2002-2003 academic year for content, prerequisites, and duplications with feedback from the Advisory Board. Discipline coordinators have been appointed Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 76 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.2.2-2 COB Assessment Efforts—Closing the Loop Assessment Instrument Date(s) Closing the Loop EBI/AACSB Surveys of Academic Experience Spring 2002, 2003, 2004, Results analyzed and shared with faculty committees Course-Embedded Assessment of Core Spring 2004, fall 2004, spring 2005 Results collected each semester and Results shared with faculty committees Curriculum Committee and discipline coordinators asked to monitor and recommend interventions, when necessary Process is new and ongoing Advising Satisfaction Survey Each semester during the advising period Results of the anonymous survey tabulated and shared with all faculty members Used for evaluation and improvement Policy changes made as a result of student changes (web registration, specific faculty advisor, professional advisor) Student Evaluation of At the end of each regular semester; all courses The computerized instrument is sent to University Institutional Research and results shared with each faculty The COB open-ended instrument collected and later shared with faculty effectiveness, planning, and policy New Faculty Orientation Survey Fall 2003, fall 2004, spring 2005 Given to new faculty after all the elements of their orientation are over Results shared with department heads for improving the orientation process Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 75 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.2.2-1 EBI Survey Results—Closing the Assessment Loop Issues Actions Taken Additional Recommendation Send more instructors for training offered by CIBERs for teaching and research on international business Quality of Classrooms New furnitu re (tables, chairs, desks, and lab chairs), new technology Advising Fall 2004 pre-registration student survey reveals a 91.5% “highly satisfactory” rating by respondents Assign students to faculty advisors by major to utilize the expertise of faculty in their specific field; create position for a full-time advisor Insufficient Computer New full-time computer systems person hired; student monitors hired; new computer lab added with 35 computers. Increase lab hours; consider weekend lab hours; increase access to other Some Dissatisfaction Higher admission standards to COB have been implemented; guidelines for classroom behavior developed; a writing intensive honors section Create the pilot honors program; emphasize reading Quality of Faculty and New faculty hires; emphasis on training (teaching seminars); pilot honors program Survey students to pinpoint Studying Faculty encouraged to raise standards; encourage students to take advantage of tutorial services; emphasis on work Placement and Career New staff for recruitment and In fall 2003 and spring 2004, the COB faculty be gan the process of strengthening the assurance of learning. Following a workshop on course-embedded assessment given by a former dean of Texas A&M University-Commerce, the business faculty worked on Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 74 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.2.2. Monitoring of Programs for Effectiveness C.2.2: Each degree program should be systema tically monitored to assess its effectiveness and should be revised to reflect new objectives and to incorporate improvements based on contemporary theory and practice. The College of Business has implemented a plan for the collection of input from various stakeholders using questionnaires on the effectiveness of programs o ffered by the College. These stakeholders include alumni, Dean’s Advisory Board members, recruiters, the College of Business faculty, and current College of Business students. All the inform ation collected from the stakeholders is reviewed each fall semester Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 73 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Exhibit C.2.1-1 New Course/Program Approval Process Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 72 of 150 Prairie View A&M University as a special topics course. The Curriculum Committee has been requested to consider developing a freshman-level professional development course that w ould be mandatory for all business majors. This is in line with the revised mission that mentions th e College’s commitment to produce graduates who are readily employable. The Committee is also consid ering a fundamentals of economics course for non- business students. Lastly, a pilot program to offe r “honors” sections of a number of business courses was launched in spring 2005 semester. A Principles of Macroeconomics section was offered as an honors section, with 20 students only and a high emphasis on building students’ writing skills. Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 71 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.2. CURRICULUM PLANNING AND EVALUATION C.2.1. Curriculum Planning C.2.1.: The curriculum for each degree program sh ould be the result of a curriculum planning process and should be consistent with the school’s mission. The Curriculum Planning Process The academic programs offered by the College of Busi ness are fully consistent with the missions of the University and the College. Furthermore, the business curriculum is in compliance with state requirements in higher education. The curriculum is sensitive to the context of contemporary business. The College faculty as a whole has primary responsib ility for the curriculum. However, the Curriculum Committee and the Graduate Committee are primarily responsible for monitoring the various curricula and for implementing the formal process of curricular change. Curriculum Change and Review Process The faculty in the College of Business has developed curri cula that are flexible a nd that adjust to changes in the business environment. Each discipline is represented by a discipline coordi Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 70 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.4.b-1 MSA Curriculum COURSES CORE REQUIRED ELECTIVE ACCT 2113 Financial Accounting 3 ACCT 2123 Managerial Accounting 3 ACCT 3213 Intermediate Accounting I 3 ACCT 3223 Intermediate Accounting II 3 ACCT 3333 Federal Income Tax I 3 ACCT 4223 Auditing 3 ACCT 5113 Advanced Auditing 3 ACCT 5123 Accounting Information Sys. 3 ACCT 5133 Accounting Managerial Dec. 3 ACCT 5143 Accounting Theory 3 ACCT 5153 Seminar Tax 3 MISY 5203 Managerial Communication 3 MISY 5513 Managerial Information Sys. 3 ECON 5103 Managerial Economics 3 ECON 5313 International Trade 3 FINA 5103 Financial Management 3 FINA 5313 Investment Analysis 3 FINA 5333 International Finance 3 MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis 3 MGMT 5343 Human Resources 3 MGMT 5353 Entrepreneurship 3 MGMT 5433 Production & Operations 3 TOTAL 18 21 9 Students with adequate prior preparation take 30 SC Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 69 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.1.3.e: The curriculum should integrate th e core areas and apply cross-functional approaches to organizational issues. Integration of the curriculum at the graduate leve l is an important goal. The curriculum has been designed to ensure such integration. The MBA degr ee program includes a capstone course with the formal role of providing an integrative learning experience in the functional business areas. For example, the specific purpose of MGMT 5323 (Strategy and Policy) is to provide the student with a capstone integrative experience. The course description in the reads, “This course is the MBA capstone which synthesizes and integrates material from the va rious functions of business as it presents itself to organizational strategic managers.” The existence of the capstone course in the MBA curriculum does not preclude other courses from riences. Several business professors use Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 68 of 150 Prairie View A&M University to a suggestion made by the mock visit team to stre ngthen the core knowledge coverage in this part of the program. C.1.3.c: Basic skills in written and oral communi cation, quantitative analysis, and computer usage should be achieved either by prior experien ce and education, or as part of the MBA curriculum. Basic written and oral communication, quantitative an alysis, and computer usage skills are normally developed by the undergraduate curriculum. St udents seeking admission to the MBA program must present evidence of a bachelor’s degree, or equivalent, as part of the application process. The expectation is that students will present evidence of courses in English composition a nd speech, mathematics, statistics, and computer applications. Table C.1.3. c-1 describes the basic skill Written Communication Composition I and II Business Communication ENGL 1123, ENGL 1133, Oral Communication Fundamentals of Speech SPCH 1003 Quantitative Analysis Basic Mathematics and MATH 1113, MATH 1153, MATH 2153, MGMT 3013 Computer Usage Computer Applications MISY 1013 Students interested in the MBA program must de monstrate their English language proficiency by submitting a 1,000-word essay that describes why they ar e interested in a graduate degree in business. International students must also submit Test of Engl ish as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) scores of 550 or Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 67 of 150 Prairie View A&M University A student with an undergraduate background that incl udes subject content equivalent to courses in the MBA core may be exempted from a few selected co re courses. Specific course requirements for each ACCT 5003 Concepts of Accounting 3 ECON 5003 Concepts of Economics 3 FINA 5003 Concepts of Finance 3 FINA 5013 Legal Environment of Business 3 MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management* 3 MGMT 5113 Business Statistics 3 ACCT 5103 Managerial Accounting 3 MISY 5203 Managerial Communication 3 MISY 5513 Managerial Info. Sys. 3 ECON 5103 Managerial Economics 3 FINA 5103 Financial Management 3 MGMT 5103 Organizational Behavior 3 MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis 3 MGMT 5433 Production & Operations 3 MGMT 5323 Strategy & Policy 3 FINA 5313 Investment Management 3 ECON 5313 International Trade 3 FINA 5333 International Finance 3 MGMT 5343 Human Resources 3 MGMT 5613 Special Topics 3 MGMT 5353 Entrepreneurship 3 TOTAL 21 30 6 * The 2005-2007 adds a new course, MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management, to the MBA core. This increases the MBA core hours from 18 to 21 SCH. The course was introduced in response Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 66 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.3.a-1 Coverage of Skills and Core Areas in the MBA Curriculum Skills AACSB Core Areas AACSB Content Area Written Communication Oral Communication Quantitative Analysis Computer Usage Financial Reporting, CORE (PREREQUISITE) REQUIREMENTS ACCT 5003 Concepts of Accounting S E S M ECON 5003 Concepts of Economic Analysis S S E S S M M FINA 5003 Concepts of Finance E S E E M FINA 5013 Legal Environment of Business S S MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management* S S S M MGMT 5113 Business Statistics S M E S MBA REQUIRED COURSES ACCT 5103 Managerial Accounting S S E S M ECON 5103 Managerial Economics E S M E FINA 5103 Theory of Financial Management S S E E M S MGMT 5103 Organizational Behavior E E S S M MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis S M E MGMT 5323 Strategy and Policy E S S S S E E MGMT 5433 Prod. & Operations Management S E S M MISY 5203 Managerial Communications M M E E MISY 5513 Management Information Systems E E S M E *The course has been recently added based on the comments from the mock visit team. Note: S = some coverage of topic (at least equiva lent to one 50-minute class period or assignment), to a full week of classes or multiple assignments), M = major component of the course Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 65 of 150 Prairie View A&M University instructors to post online syllabi, course materials, and gr ades. It also allows the students to interact with faculty and fellow students in discussion forums Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 64 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Except for accounting, each major w ithin the BBA program allows a de gree of flexibility in curriculum through elective courses. The choice of elective co urses also creates some flexibility necessary for the deployment of faculty resources, and allows the College to take advantage of in dividual faculty expertise and the development of new course offerings. Minor fields of study offered by the College of Business include accounting, business administration, economics, finance, international business, manageme Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 63 of 150 Prairie View A&M University communication skills of business students through suppor t from professional staff and tutors. Faculty can require students to visit tutors in the CBC to cr itique drafts of written assignments such as business General Education & General Education Supplement ECON 2113 Principles of Micro. Econ EQ, PW, HW, QZ CD ECON 2123 Principles of Macro. Econ EQ, PW, HW, QZ CD MISY 1013 Introduction to CIS EQ, HW, QZ MGMT 3013 Business Statistics EQ, HW CD Business Core ACCT 2113 Financial Acct. EQ, HW, QZ ACCT 2123 Managerial Acct. EQ, HW, PW, QZ CD FINA 2203 Legal Environment EQ, CA, QZ CD FINA 3103 Principles of Finance EQ, HW, QZ MGMT 1013 Introduction to Business EQ, PW, HW CP, CD MGMT 3103 Principles of Mgmt EQ, PW, QZ CP, CD MGMT 4303 St. Mgmt & B. Policy EQ, QZ, PW CP, CD MGMT 4333 Production & Op. Mgmt EQ, HW, QZ CD MISY 3303 Business Communication EQ, HW, PW, QZ CP, CD, QZ, CA Note: CP = class presentation (group presentation), CA = case analysis, PW = project and written report (research paper), EQ = examination questions, CD = class discussion (observation), QZ = quizzes, HW = homework C.1.2.d: The school should state additional req Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 62 of 150 Prairie View A&M University BUSINESS CORE REQUIREMENTS ACCT 2113 Financial Accounting S M S M ACCT 2123 Managerial Accounting S S E S M FINA 2203 Legal Environment S S FINA 3103 Principles of Finance S E S E S MGMT 1013 Introduction to Business S S E MGMT 3103 Principles of Management E E S E MGMT 4303 Strategic Mgmt. & Business Policy E E E MGMT 4333 Production & Operations Mgmt. S S E S M MISY 3303 Business Communication M M E Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 61 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.1.2.b: The curriculum should include foundation knowledge for business in the following areas: mathematics, and statistics. As shown in Table C.1.2.b-1, more than half of the 123 SCH required in the BBA program address foundational knowledge in acc ounting, behavioral and social sciences, economics, and mathematics and Table C.1.2.b-1 Coverage of Skills and Foundations in the BBA Curriculum Skills Foundations AACSB Content Area Written Communication Oral Communication Quantitative Analysis Computer Usage Accounting Behavioral Science Economics Mathematics & GENERAL EDUCATION & GENERAL EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT REQUIREMENTS ENGL 1123 Freshman Composition I M ENGL 1133 Freshman Composition II M SPCH 1003 Fundamentals of Speech Communication M MATH 1113 College Algebra M MATH 1153 Finite Math M MATH 2153 Calculus for Bus/Soc/Life Sciences M ECON 2113 Principles of Microeconomics S S S E M ECON 2123 Principles of Macroeconomics S S S E M ECON (Elective) E M HIST 1313 The U.S. to 1876 M HIST 1323 The U.S.—1876 to Present M POSC 1113 American Government I M POSC 1123 American Government II M PSYC 1113 General Psychology M MISY 1013 Intro. to Computer Information Systems S M MGMT 3013 Business Statistics E S M E M Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 60 of 150 Prairie View A&M University (Introduction to Management Information Systems) among other courses to satisfy the behavior/social science and computing requirements. General educa tion is supplemented by an additional 21 SCH of general education supplement that includes courses in economics and statistics offered by the COB. Every business student seeking a BBA degree must take 30 SCH of COB courses regardless of their chosen major or area of specialization. Students take additional courses to satisfy their selected major or area of specialization within the BBA degree. Table C.1.2.a-1 presents the BBA degree requirements classified into four areas—general education (42 SCH), general education supplement (21 SCH), busin ess core (30 SCH), and major (30 SCH). Courses (63 SCH) in both General Educati on and General Education Supplement constitute the general education component. Thus, the above standard is satisfied since the general education component (63 SCH) comprises at least 50 percent of the 123 SCH requ ired for the BBA program at Prairie View A&M University. Bachelor of Business Administration Curriculum General General ENGL 1123 & 1133 6 SPCH 1003 3 MATH 1113, 1153 & 2153 3 6 SCIENCE 6 HUM. & VIS. PERF. ARTS 6 HIST 1313 & 1323 6 POSC 1113 & 1123 6 PSYC 1113 3 PHIL 2023/MGMT2203 3 ECON 2113 & 2123, ECON 9 MISY 1013 3 MGMT 3013 Statistics 3 ACCT 2113 & 2123 6 MISY 3303 Bus. Comm. 3 FINA 2203 & 3103 6 MGMT 1013, 3103, 4303, & 12 MRKT 3103 3 MAJOR REQUIREMENTS 21-30 UNRESTRICTED ELECTIVES 0-9 TOTALS 42 21 30 30 TOTAL REQ. FOR BBA 123 Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 59 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.1-2 Coverage of Business Perspectives in the MBA Curriculum Perspectives AACSB Content Area CORE (PREREQUISITE) REQUIREMENTS ACCT 5003 Concepts of Accounting S S S S E S S ECON 5003 Concepts of Economic Analysis S E E E S FINA 5003 Concepts of Finance S E S E FINA 5013 Legal Environment of Business S S E E M S S MGMT 5003 Concepts of Management* E S S S S S S S MGMT 5113 Business Statistics MBA REQUIRED COURSES ACCT 5103 Managerial Accounting S S S S S ECON 5103 Managerial Economics S E S E E S FINA 5103 Theory of Financial Management S E S E E MGMT 5103 Organizational Behavior E S S S S S MGMT 5123 Quantitative Analysis E MGMT 5323 Strategy and Policy S S S S S S S S MGMT 5433 Prod. & Operations Management S S E MISY 5203 Managerial Communication S S S E S S S S MISY 5513 Management Information Systems S S S E *The course has been recently added based on the comments from the mock visit team. Note: S = some coverage of topic (at least equiva lent to one 50-minute class period or assignment), to a full week of classes or multiple assignments), M = major component of the course C.1.2: Undergraduate Business Program C.1.2.a: Each undergraduate curriculum should ha ve a general education component that normally comprises at least 50 percent of the student’s four-year program. At Prairie View A&M University, general education consists of 42 SCH, including introductions to history, political science, and other sciences, in addition to mathemati cs and composition. As part of general education, business students must take PSYC 1113 (General Psychology) and MISY 1013 Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 58 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table C.1.1-1 Coverage of Business Perspectives in the BBA Curriculum Perspectives AACSB Content Area GENERAL EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT IN PHIL 2023 Ethics* M ECON 2113 Principles of Microeconomics E S S S S ECON 2123 Principles of Macroeconomics E E E S S MISY 1013 Introduction to Computer Information Systems S E MGMT 3013 Business Statistics S S BUSINESS CORE REQUIREMENTS ACCT 2113 Financial Accounting S S M S ACCT 2123 Managerial Accounting S S S S FINA 2203 Legal Environment of Business S S E E M S S S FINA 3103 Principles of Finance S S S S S S MGMT 1013 Introduction to Business E S S S S S S S MGMT 3103 Principles of Management E S S S S S S S MGMT 4303 Strategic Mgmt. & Business Policy S S S S S S S S MGMT 4333 Production & Operations Mgmt. E S S S E MISY 3303 Business Communication S S E E S S S S Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 57 of 150 Prairie View A&M University C.1. CURRICULUM CONTENT C.1.1: Both undergraduate and MBA curricula shou ld provide an understanding of perspectives ess. Coverage should include: Self-Evaluation Report Curriculum Conten t and Evaluation College of Business Page 56 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Self-Evaluation Report Faculty Composition and Development College of Business Page 43 of 150 Prairie View A&M University FD.3e: The school should have clear policies concerning outside faculty activities, both paid and ion and with other institutional policies. COB policies relating to outside employment are govern ed by the Prairie View A&M University and The Texas A&M University System policies (TAMUS Polic ies 31.05, 31.05.02, and 07.01). The University HR office requires faculty and staff working outside th e campus to fill an outside employment declaration form annually. These are kept in the human reso urces office. The COB administration believes that outside voluntary activity and c onsulting with businesses should be encouraged. Consulting with business and industry adds to faculty professional expertise and enriches classroom instruction. Faculty members are encouraged to seek in ternship and consulting in summer months. For administrators on 12- month appointments, University policies restrict outside paid activities during normal working hours. These policies are consistent with the COB mission of excellence in teaching, research, and service. FD.4. FACULTY SIZE, COMPOSITION, AND DEPLOYMENT FD.4.a: The school should maintain a full-time faculty sufficient to provide stability and ongoing The COB at Prairie View A&M University has worked hard to maintain a core full-time qualified faculty Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 148 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Evidence of Continuous Improvements The annual number of refereed journal articles has increased from 13 in 2000/01 to 50 in 2004/05. Although the faculty size has increased during this period, this increase (284%) is impressive. The growth has been sustained from year to year and is broad based with most faculty members with an active research agenda. Counting broadly, the total number of annual in tellectual contributions over this period has increased from 58 to 170. This demonstrates that active participation in research has now been embraced by the College faculty. An active research seminar series has attracted ma ny faculty presenters and outside speakers with established research credentials. The newly adopted strategic plan makes specifi c reference to the quality of publications. The central administration continues to make av ailable resources to support reduced teaching loads and other incentives for success in intellectual contributions. Future Plans The statistics presented in this section demonstrate the considerable success in the area of intellectual contributions achieved by the business faculty at Prair ie View A&M University. The College is confident the faculty research activities will be sustained in the long run. Focus more attention on producing research in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 147 of 150 Prairie View A&M University In the 2002 Accreditation Plan, the College had identifie d several deficiencies in the area of research and intellectual contributions. A before and after analys is shows the considerable progress that has been Teaching load is too high All graduate faculty now have a reduced load of 3+3 members have an active research Faculty publication has increased markedly in recent years; almost all tenure track faculty members have published PRJ articles in recent years; even non-tenure track faculty are participating in intellectual efforts. Technology support for faculty and have invested heavily in technology infrastructure and services; all business faculty and staff have their own computers and local printers; new staff has been added for technology support; all classrooms are equipped with the state-of-art Lack of adequate clerical and The number of full-time administrative staff has increased from four to six; the Center for Business Communications can assist faculty improve their drafts; the two assistants to the dean also work with faculty to support teaching and grant writing; graduate assistants and student workers are now available for faculty Lack of incentives (merit raises) and This has improved dramatically with the merit raises now directly connected to success in publishing articles in peer-reviewed journals. In th e last two merit raise cycles, the most productive researchers received substantial adjustments; Dean’s Exce llence in Research Award comes with a $1,000 prize. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 146 of 150 Prairie View A&M University List of Peer Reviewed Journals Where JOURNAL NAME FREQUENCY Portfolio Management 1 Journal of Regional Science 1 Journal of Scheduling 2 Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1 Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 1 Managerial Finance Journal 1 Regional Business Review 1 SIAM Review 1 Southern Business & Economic Journal 1 Southwestern Business Administration Journal 1 Tax Notes 1 The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 1 The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 1 The International Journal of Business and Public Administration 1 The International Journal of Men’s Health 1 The Journal of Applied Accounting Research 1 The Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 1 The Journal of Current Research in Global Business 3 The Journal of Human-Centered Systems and Machine Intelligence 1 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1 The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 1 Troy State University Business and Economic Review 1 Water Resources Management 1 Total Number of Different Peer Reviewed Journals = 88 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 145 of 150 Prairie View A&M University List of Peer Reviewed Journals Where JOURNAL NAME FREQUENCY International Journal of Informa tion Technology and Decision Making 1 International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management 1 International Journal of Logis tics Systems and Management 1 International Journal of Manageme nt and Enterprise Development 1 International Journal of Mobile Communications 1 International Journal of Service Management 1 International Journal of Technol International Review of Applied Economics 1 Journal of Accounting and Finance Research 1 Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 1 Journal of Bangladesh Studies 3 Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching 1 Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 2 Journal of Developing Areas 1 Journal of Economic Development 1 Journal of Empirical Finance 1 Journal of Financial and Economic Practice 1 Journal of Forensic Accounting 2 Journal of Global Business 1 Journal of Global Information Management 1 Journal of Global Information Technology Management 1 Journal of Information Technology Management 1 Journal of International Financial Journal of International Money and Finance 2 Journal of International Technolog y and Information Management 1 Journal of Labor Economics 1 Journal of Multinational Financial Management 1 Journal of Multi-state Taxation & Incentives 1 Journal of Product & Brand Management 1 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 144 of 150 Prairie View A&M University List of Peer Reviewed Journals Where JOURNAL NAME FREQUENCY Academy of Accounting & Fi nancial Studies Journal 1 American Business Review 1 Annals of Economics and Finance 1 Applied Financial Economics 5 Asia Pacific Management Review 4 Business Journal for Entrepreneurs 1 CIIMA (Communications of the IIMA) 4 Contemporary Economic Policy 1 Eastern Economic Review 1 Economic Inquiry 1 El Trimestre Económico 1 European Journal of Operational Research 2 Financial Review 1 Florida State University Law Review 1 Global Business & Economic Review 2 Global Business & Finance Review 1 History of Economic Ideas 1 Human Systems Management 1 IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering 1 Industrial Management and Data Systems 1 Information Systems Journal 1 International Journal of Acc International Journal of Business and Economics 1 International Journal of Digital Management 1 International Journal of Condition Monitoring & Diagnostic Engineering Management Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 143 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Total and Annual Average Faculty Intellectual Contributions Count Avg. CountAvg. CountAvg. CountAvg. CountAvg. Management Bailey, H. 1 0.2 1 0.2 2 0.4 4 0.8 Debnath, S.* 3 0.6 5 1.0 4 0.8 3 0.6 15 3.0 Dyck, J.* 1 0.2 1 0.2 Geismar, N.* 5 1.0 2 0.4 5 1.0 10 2.0 22 4.4 20 4.0 8 1.6 12 2.4 12 2.4 52 10.4 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 Sutanto, P.* 1 0.2 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 13 2.6 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 3 0.6 Discipline Total 30 6.0 22 4.4 27 5.4 33 6.6 112 22.4 1 0.2 3 0.6 2 0.4 1 0.2 7 1.4 3 0.6 2 0.4 5 1.0 Holloway, R. 0 0.0 Mahfouz, A.* 4 0.8 8 1.6 3 0.6 6 1.2 21 4.2 12 2.4 4 0.8 8 1.6 7 1.4 31 6.2 Tomiuk, D. 1 0.2 1 0.2 2 0.4 2 0.4 6 1.2 Discipline Total 18 3.6 16 3.2 18 3.6 18 3.6 70 14.0 6 1.2 4 0.8 3 0.6 2 0.4 15 3.0 1 0.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 3 0.6 16 3.2 Tandon, S.* 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.4 8 1.6 Discipline Total 9 1.8 12 2.4 11 2.2 7 1.4 39 7.8 College Total 130 26 88 18 147 29 140 28 505 101 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 142 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Total and Annual Average Faculty Intellectual Contributions Count Avg. CountAvg. CountAvg. CountAvg. CountAvg. Chong, G.* 4 0.8 8 1.6 10 2.0 22 4.4 2 0.4 1 0.2 3 0.6 Dobiyanski, A. 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 3 0.6 6 1.2 11 2.2 5 1.0 6 1.2 28 5.6 1 0.2 3 0.6 2 0.4 2 0.4 8 1.6 2 0.4 7 1.4 6 1.2 2 0.4 17 3.4 Discipline Total 14 2.8 21 4.2 24 4.8 22 4.4 81 16.2 Business Communication 3 0.6 3 0.6 5 1 11 2.2 Economics Langley, S.* 2 0.4 2 0.4 1 0.2 5 1.0 9 1.8 4 0.8 7 1.4 14 2.8 34 6.8 Quddus, M.* 7 1.4 4 0.8 9 1.8 16 3.2 36 7.2 Sharma, S. 0 0.0 Soliman, M. 1 0.2 2 0.4 4 0.8 7 1.4 3 0.6 1 0.2 6 1.2 6 1.2 16 3.2 Discipline Total 22 4.4 11 2.2 28 5.6 37 7.4 98 19.6 Handforth. F.* 1 0.2 4 0.8 5 1.0 1 0.2 2 0.4 3 0.6 6 1.2 2 0.4 1 0.2 4 0.8 3 0.6 10 2.0 27 5.4 2 0.4 19 3.8 9 1.8 57 11.4 Discipline Total 31 6.2 3 0.6 29 5.8 15 3 78 15.6 Note: * Graduate Faculty Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 141 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Individual Faculty Count of All Intellectual Contributions (2000/1 – 2004/5) Faculty Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total IC Management Bailey, H. 4 4 Debnath, S. 1 1 5 8 15 Dyck, J. 1 1 Geismar, N. 1 4 7 22 Gupta, O. 2 7 12 17 52 Liang, L. 1 1 Nelson, G. 1 1 Sutanto, P. 7 3 2 1 13 White, L. Discipline Total 2 17 22 26 45 112 Chen, W. 2 1 Hinson, S. 3 1 1 5 Holloway, R. 0 Mahfouz, A. 4 1 2 3 21 Opara, E. 1 7 8 8 7 31 Tomiuk, D. 2 2 2 6 Discipline Total 12 12 13 14 19 70 3 2 16 Hill, J. 1 4 2 Joonas, K. 1 1 13 16 Tandon, S. 1 4 3 8 Discipline Total 2 6 2 22 7 39 College Total 58 67 85 125 170 505 shaded numbers denote the year in which the faculty me mber joined PVAMU as a full-time faculty. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 140 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Individual Faculty Count of All Intellectual Contributions (2000/1 – 2004/5) Faculty Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total IC Chong, G. 5 5 2 4 22 Desselle, B. 2 1 3 Dobiyanski, A. 0 Feucht, F. 2 1 3 Lee, B. 5 3 5 6 28 Pence, D. 2 6 8 Reed, R. 8 3 6 17 Discipline Total 18 10 9 16 28 81 Business Communication Bell, R. 5 6 11 Economics Langley, S. 1 2 5 Quazi, R. 1 1 8 19 34 Quddus, M. 10 2 5 9 36 Sharma, S. 0 Soliman, M. 1 1 1 2 2 7 Wallace, F. 3 2 4 16 Discipline Total 15 12 11 21 39 98 Handforth. F. 1 1 1 5 Jasper, J. 1 1 3 1 6 Khan, M. 1 2 3 4 10 Yang, J. 5 21 11 17 57 Discipline Total 6 5 25 18 24 78 shaded numbers denote the year in which the faculty me mber joined PVAMU as a full-time faculty. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 139 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years Name J P N O J P N OJ P NOJ P NOJ P N O J P N O T Business Law 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 7 3 16 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 3 2 9 1 2 2 2 2 1 5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 4 1 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 5 23 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 2 4 5 2 13 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 8 9 1 2 1 1 3 9 12 3 1 3 2 2 3 7 2 4 3 5 3 5 4 7 4 2 7 24 11 1 2 1 4 4 1 0 8 1 6 9 2 4 1 0 2 5 1 6 2 5 9 3 4 1 9 2 2 4 0 4 8 1 326 3 3 4 2 1 2 1 4 6 4 7 E 3 1 6 2 1 8 1 3 8 1 6 3 0 2 0 1 3 3 3 1 9 3 4 2 7 4 6 1 8 5 0 2 4 3 1 6 5 13 0 88 1 4 7 1 4 0 505 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 138 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years Faculty J P N O J P N O J P N O J P N O J P N O J P N O T 3 3 1 3 3 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 White 0 1 3 4 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 8 1 5 12 8 12 13 45 1 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 7 3 4 4 15 8 9 12 44 3 1 2 3 1 3 4 3 3 3 6 6 8 23 2 2 3 5 7 5 5 5 7 5 7 9 5 18 7 8 12 30 22 27 33 112 Management Information Systems 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 3 2 5 0 0 0 Holloway 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 4 2 2 3 4 5 2 6 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 3 1 4 4 2 1 12 4 8 4 28 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 3 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 5 8 2 4 4 17 12 17 13 59 1 3 1 1 2 4 6 1 5 4 2 2 2 8 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 8 3 4 4 18 16 18 18 70 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 137 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years & Faculty J P N O J P NOJPN OJ P NOJ P N O J P N OT 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 10 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 5 4 1 10 3 1 1 1 1 6110 5 1 7 1 2 6 22 2 15 7 46 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 1 11 3 2 1 1 2 6113 6 3 1 9 2 3 7 25 3 22 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 7 4 2 1 1 3 7115 2 9 6 3 2 5 7 31 3 29 Management 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 Bailey 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 4 4 3 13 0 1 1 1 Dyck 0 1 11 2 1 1 2 3 4 1 5 5 2 5 0 0 1 1 222 1 1 2 4 7 3 4 2 16 1 1 1 2 311 3 2 2 2 1 6 1 2 1 12 4 6 8 30 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 6 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 136 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Last 5 Years & Faculty J P N O J P NOJ P NOJ P NOJ PN O J P N O T Economics 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 12 22 5 5 3 5 6 19 1 1 1 2 11 6 2 1 2 8 13 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 11 11 2 2 1 3 8 14 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 3 6 8 21 0 0 Sharma 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 4 7 Soliman 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 4 2 1 4 4 11 Wallace 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 4 1 2 7 1 4 1 1 1 4 2 4 1 4 1 5 24 55 11 12 7 18 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 4 21 1 9 6 4 9 6 7 2 3 3 6 2 6 3 5 3 9 46 56 22 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 0 0 0 Jasper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 6 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 135 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Individual Faculty Cumulative IC Portfolio (2000/1 – 2004/5) & Faculty J P N O J P NOJ P N OJ P NOJP N O J P N O T Accounting 1 1 3 4 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 4 4 8 16 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 Desselle 1 1 1 0 0 Dobiyanski 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 12 1 4 5 2 6 24 1 1 1 3 3 0 1 112 2 1 1 3 2 2 8 Pence 0 0 2 2 1 1 112 2 1 2 5 4 2 13 2 2 2 2 4 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 6 2 7 3 1 4 1 2 2 3 5 4 3 336 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 2 9 2 9 6 1 1 7 2 3 2 1 3 5 4 4 336 6 Business Communication 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 11 1 4 2 2 5 9 Graduate faculty. Scholarship Type: B = Basic Schol arship; A = Applied Scholarship; I = Instructional Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 134 of 150 Prairie View A&M University annually allotted to each faculty member. However, if a faculty member is pres enting a paper, the dean’s office will provide additional funds. In 2002, the PVAMU formally joined a platform of eight Centers for International Business and Education Research. Under this initiative, since 2003, at least ten COB faculty members have received training on teaching and resear ch on international business topics in various CIBER workshops across the country. Student Assistants A limited number of undergraduate and graduate studen t workers are available to assist faculty members Faculty Research Seminar Series Each semester the Intellectual Contributions Committ ee organizes a faculty research seminar series. The seminar series have helped create a vibrant atmosphe re for collaborative research across disciplines. The seminars provide faculty members with an inform Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 133 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The College has in place an innova tive and generous support mechanism involvement in quality research has become a norm. The system works through a combination of incentives, rewards and recognitions discussed below. Dean’s Excellence in Research Award One faculty member is selected each year for this award based on the number of refereed journal articles published or accepted for publication. The selection criterion would eventually be expanded beyond journal articles to include the entire spectrum of in tellectual contributions as defined by AACSB (books, Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 132 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Minimum Standards in Intellectual Contributions While excellence in terms of intellectual contributi on is desirable, an academically qualified faculty member is expected to provide evidence of satisf actory level of productivity (regarding intellectual contribution) during the period of evaluation under consideration. Professionally qualified faculty may have a higher teaching load compared to academic ally qualified faculty, and consequentially, a lower requirement for intellectual contribution As outlined by AACSB International, a broad spectrum of activities is included in the area of intellectual contribution. While a faculty member’s contribution in any of these areas will be taken into consideration, the minimum requirements for satisfactory performance in this area for tenure and/or promotion to the next rank shall include the following: Three refereed journal publications Four publications in well-recognized refereed journals Faculty in the College of Business may be classified as either academically or professionally qualified, or other. To be academically or professionally qualifie d, a faculty member must have a combination of academic preparation augmented by current professi onal development activities in the area of teaching assignment. Based on internal discussions and consu ltations with members of the mock visit team, deans of peer institutions and the AACSB staff, the following definitions have been adopted. Academically Qualified (AQ) Faculty : The faculty member must have a terminal degree in the area of teaching assignment, or in a related area, as ou Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 131 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Int. Contributions by Faculty, Discipline and Scholarship Type (2000/1 – 2004/5) Instructional Development Management Bailey, H. 3 1 4 Debnath, S. 2 13 15 Dyck, J. 1 1 Geismar, N. 22 22 16 30 6 52 1 1 1 1 Sutanto, P. 7 5 1 13 3 3 Discipline Total 45 44 23 112 1 4 2 7 5 5 Holloway, R. 0 Mahfouz, A. 3 17 1 21 1 28 2 31 Tomiuk, D. 5 1 6 Discipline Total 5 59 6 70 1 11 3 15 2 9 5 16 Tandon, S. 3 5 8 Discipline Total 3 23 13 39 College Total 77 326 102 505 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 130 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Int. Contributions by Faculty, Discipline and Scholarship Type (2000/1 – 2004/5) Instructional Development Chong, G. 5 16 1 22 Desselle, B. 2 1 3 Dobiyanski, A. 0 Feucht, F. 3 3 Lee, B. 1 24 3 28 Pence, D. 8 8 Reed, R. 13 4 17 Discipline Total 6 66 9 81 Business Communication Bell, R. 2 9 11 Economics Langley, S. 5 5 Quazi, R. 2 19 13 34 Quddus, M. 1 14 21 36 Sharma, S. 0 Soliman, M. 7 7 Wallace, F. 4 11 1 16 Discipline Total 7 56 35 98 Handforth. F. 1 4 5 Jasper, J. 6 6 Khan, M. 10 10 Yang, J. 10 46 1 57 Discipline Total 11 60 7 78 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 129 of 150 Prairie View A&M University The mission statements of Prairie View A&M Univers ity and the College of Business both explicitly state the entities’ commitment to the pursu it of “excellence in teaching, research and service.” Since PVAMU is primarily a teaching institution, the principal missi on is to educate students. However, the College fully recognizes that intellectual contributions enhance a nd update the faculty’s knowledge base, which they 9 14 15 20 19 % of Total 16 21 18 16 11 37 40 59 75 115 % of Total 64 60 69 60 68 12 13 11 30 36 Instructional Development % of Total 21 19 13 24 21 58 67 85 125 170 505 Intellectual Contributions Portfolio by Scholarship Type (2000/1 - 2004/5) Basic Applied Instructional Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 128 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table IC-2 (cont’d) Hill, J. 3 3 6 Joonas, K. 1 1 Tandon, S. 2 2 Discipline Total 0 3 0 4 2 9 College Total 13 13 20 34 50 130 Note: This and other tables exclude the publications of faculty who have left period; similarly, the tables include the relevant publications of the new faculty members who have joined the College during this period. IC.1. INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS IC.1: Faculty members should make intellectual cont ributions on a continuing basis appropriate to the school’s mission. The outputs from intellectual contributions should be available for Following the mission, the business faculty is comm itted to intellectual contributions on a continuous basis. While some of these contributions are basi c scholarship, a good number of publications are applied research, and related to instructi onal development. The College exp ects intellectual contributions from each full-time faculty member. Merit raise, promo tion, tenure, and post-tenure evaluation processes reinforce this expectation. The College administration has supported strategies to increase research with a myriad of favorable policies. These include reduc ed teaching load, summer re search grants, increased funding for professional travel, covering submissi on journal fees, incentives for mentoring and collaboration, and recognition. Given our emphasis on undergraduate teaching, a wei ght of 30 percent is assigned to intellectual contributions in faculty evaluations. The College de partment heads, using a modified version of the University’s Annual Performance Development Inst rument, assign 30 percent weight to success in scholarship for annual merit raises. These expectat ions are reinforced during the peer evaluation for tenure-track faculty conducted by the Faculty Comp osition and Development Committee, the Department Over the past five years (2000-2005), the College’s faculty has increased from less than 20 to 37. Table IC.1-5 and IC.1-3 show the average number of total in tellectual contributions over this five-year period is 13.6 per faculty member and 19.7 per graduate faculty member, while the average number of PRJ articles published is 3.5 per faculty member and 5.4 per gradua te faculty member. Furthermore, over this period 38 percent of all faculty members published three or more PRJ articles, 76 percent of the faculty have published at least one PRJ article, a nd 73 percent of the faulty had five or more IC activities as broadly defined by AACSB standards. Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 127 of 150 Prairie View A&M University Table IC-2 (cont’d) Business Communication Bell, R. 2 1 3 Economics Langley, S. 1 1 2 Quazi, R. 1 1 2 1 4 9 Quddus, M. 4 2 1 7 Sharma, S. 0 Soliman, M. 1 1 Wallace, F. 1 2 3 Discipline Total 6 3 2 5 6 22 Handforth. F. 1 1 Jasper, J. 1 1 Khan, M. 1 1 2 Yang, J. 4 1 7 7 8 27 Discipline Total 4 1 7 9 10 31 Management Bailey, H. 0 Debnath, S. 3 3 Dyck, J. 1 1 Geismar, N. 1 4 5 Gupta, O. 1 5 3 11 20 Liang, L. 0 Nelson, G. 0 Sutanto, P. 1 1 White, L. 0 Discipline Total 0 2 5 5 18 30 Chen, W. 1 1 Hinson, S. 0 Holloway, R. 0 Mahfouz, A. 4 4 Opara, E. 1 1 3 3 4 12 Tomiuk, D. 1 1 Discipline Total 1 2 3 4 8 18 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 126 of 150 Prairie View A&M University potential for attaining this status in a short time fr Chong, G. 2 1 1 4 Desselle, B. 0 Dobiyanski, A. 0 Feucht, F. 1 1 Lee, B. 1 1 3 1 6 Pence, D. 1 1 Reed, R. 1 1 2 Discipline Total 2 1 3 5 3 14 Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 125 of 150 Prairie View A&M University 2000-012001-022002-032003-042004-05 Journal Articles Proceedings Presentations Other IC Total IC The sustained increase in faculty research productivity in recent years was achieved partly through the recruitment of new faculty members. Since fall 2001, the full time faculty has roughly doubled with most of the new faculty recruited on tenure-track appointment s. A few senior faculty members at the professor and associate professor rank were hired with tenure on arrival. The search committees have followed a consistent strategy of identifying candidates who are either already academically qualified, or show a high Other Journal Proceedings 17% Presentations 29% Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 124 of 150 Prairie View A&M University counted more than once if the resear ch was presented in multiple forums as it evolved from an early draft to a final journal article. For example, if a paper was first presented in an in-house seminar and then turned into a more complete working paper, a c onference proceeding, and was finally published as a journal article, it would be counted more than once assuming that the research evolved significantly over its life. Co-authored papers were counted for each author who is on the College faculty. However, the last column in Table IC-1 presents a “unique count ,” in which the number of co-authored intellectual contributions are counted only once in the portfol io. The College’s performance evaluation policies encourage collaborative research, and indeed this has been a source of strength in our research success. For summer grants and other recognition such as the Dean’s Excellence Award, co-authors have often shared award money and recognition. 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Refereed Conference Proceedings Conference Presentation Self-Evaluation Report Intellectual C ontributions College of Business Page 123 of 150 Prairie View A&M University